Physiol. Genomics Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Physiol. Genomics 27: 337-350, 2006. First published September 5, 2006; doi:10.1152/physiolgenomics.00030.2006
1094-8341/06 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Tables
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
27/3/337    most recent
00030.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zimmerman, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Pack, A. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zimmerman, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Pack, A. I.
Received 20 February 2006; accepted in final form 31 August 2006.
Physiological Genomics 27:337-350 (2006)
1094-8341/06 $8.00 © 2006 American Physiological Society

Multiple mechanisms limit the duration of wakefulness in Drosophila brain

John E. Zimmerman1, Wendy Rizzo1, Keith R. Shockley2, David M. Raizen1, Nirinjini Naidoo1, Miroslaw Mackiewicz1, Gary A. Churchill2 and Allan I. Pack1

1 Center for Sleep and Respiratory Neurobiology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
2 The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine

The functions of sleep and what controls it remain unanswered biological questions. According to the two-process model, a circadian process and a homeostatic process interact to regulate sleep. While progress has been made in understanding the molecular and cellular functions of the circadian process, the mechanisms of the homeostatic process remain undiscovered. We use the recently established sleep model system organism Drosophila melanogaster to examine dynamic changes in gene expression during sleep and during prolonged wakefulness in the brain. Our experimental design controls for circadian processes by killing animals at three matched time points from the beginning of the consolidated rest period [Zeitgeber time (ZT) 14)] under two conditions, sleep deprived and spontaneously sleeping. Using ANOVA at a false discovery rate of 5%, we have identified 252 genes that were differentially expressed between sleep-deprived and control groups in the Drosophila brain. Using linear trends analysis, we have separated the significant differentially expressed genes into nine temporal expression patterns relative to a common anchor point (ZT 14). The most common expression pattern is a decrease during extended wakefulness but no change during spontaneous sleep (n = 114). Genes in this category were involved in protein production (n = 47), calcium homeostasis, and membrane excitability (n = 5). Multiple mechanisms, therefore, act to limit wakefulness. In addition, by studying the effects of the mechanical stimulus used in our deprivation studies during the period when the animals are predominantly active, we provide evidence for a previously unappreciated role for the Drosophila immune system in the brain response to stress.

sleep deprivation; temporal regulation; stress







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the American Physiological Society.