|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Pediatrics, The Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA; Human and Molecular Genetics Center, The Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
2 Pediatrics, The Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
3 Human and Molecular Genetics Center, The Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: mhessner{at}mcw.edu.
Despite their lower cost and high content flexibility, a limitation of in-house prepared arrays has been their susceptibility to quality control (QC) issues and lack of QC standards across laboratories. Therefore, we developed a novel three-color array system that allows prehybridization QC as well as the Matarray software to facilitate acquisition of accurate gene expression data. In this study, we compared performance of our rat cDNA array to the Affymetrix RG-U34A and Agilent G4130A arrays using 2,824 UniGenes represented on all three arrays. Prior to data filtering, poor interplatform agreement was observed, however, after data filtering differentially expressed UniGenes exhibited correlation coefficients of 0.91, 0.88, and 0.92 between the Affymetrix versus Agilent, Affymetrix versus cDNA, and Agilent versus cDNA arrays, respectively. The Affymetrix, Agilent, and cDNA arrays agreed well with quantitative RT-PCR conducted on 42 UniGenes, yielding correlation coefficients of 0.90, 0.90, and 0.96, respectively. Each platform underestimated ratios relative to quantitative RT-PCR, possessing respective slopes of 0.86 (R2=0.81), 0.65 (R2=0.81), and 0.70 (R2=0.92). Overall, these data show that the combination of our novel technical and analytical approaches yield an accurate platform for functional genomics that is concordant with commercial discovery arrays in terms of identifying regulated genes and pathways.
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |