Physiol. Genomics AJP: Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Physiol. Genomics (January 10, 2006). doi:10.1152/physiolgenomics.00243.2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Tables
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
25/1/166    most recent
00243.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hessner, M. J
Right arrow Articles by Wang, X.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hessner, M. J
Right arrow Articles by Wang, X.
Submitted on October 4, 2005
Accepted on December 30, 2005

Three-color cDNA microarrays with prehybridization quality control yield gene expression data comparable to that of commercial platforms

Martin J Hessner1*, Bixia Xiang2, Shuang Jia2, Rhonda Geoffrey1, Shannon Holmes2, Lisa Meyer3, Sanaa Muheisen3, and Xujing Wang1

1 Pediatrics, The Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA; Human and Molecular Genetics Center, The Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
2 Pediatrics, The Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
3 Human and Molecular Genetics Center, The Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: mhessner{at}mcw.edu.

Despite their lower cost and high content flexibility, a limitation of in-house prepared arrays has been their susceptibility to quality control (QC) issues and lack of QC standards across laboratories. Therefore, we developed a novel three-color array system that allows prehybridization QC as well as the Matarray software to facilitate acquisition of accurate gene expression data. In this study, we compared performance of our rat cDNA array to the Affymetrix RG-U34A and Agilent G4130A arrays using 2,824 UniGenes represented on all three arrays. Prior to data filtering, poor interplatform agreement was observed, however, after data filtering differentially expressed UniGenes exhibited correlation coefficients of 0.91, 0.88, and 0.92 between the Affymetrix versus Agilent, Affymetrix versus cDNA, and Agilent versus cDNA arrays, respectively. The Affymetrix, Agilent, and cDNA arrays agreed well with quantitative RT-PCR conducted on 42 UniGenes, yielding correlation coefficients of 0.90, 0.90, and 0.96, respectively. Each platform underestimated ratios relative to quantitative RT-PCR, possessing respective slopes of 0.86 (R2=0.81), 0.65 (R2=0.81), and 0.70 (R2=0.92). Overall, these data show that the combination of our novel technical and analytical approaches yield an accurate platform for functional genomics that is concordant with commercial discovery arrays in terms of identifying regulated genes and pathways.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the American Physiological Society.