Physiol. Genomics Journal of Neurophysiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Physiol. Genomics (November 15, 2005). doi:10.1152/physiolgenomics.00234.2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Tables
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
24/3/264    most recent
00234.2004v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Porter, J. D
Right arrow Articles by Kaminski, H. J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Porter, J. D
Right arrow Articles by Kaminski, H. J
Submitted on October 7, 2004
Accepted on November 10, 2005

Distinctive Morphologic and Gene/Protein Expression Signatures during Myogenesis in Novel Cell Lines from Extraocular and Hindlimb Muscle

John D Porter1*, Sheri Israel1, Bendi Gong1, Anita P Merriam1, Jason Feuerman1, Sangeeta Khanna1, and Henry J Kaminski1

1 Departments of Neurology and Neurosciences, Case Western Reserve University and University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: porterjo{at}ninds.nih.gov.

Skeletal muscles are not created equal. The under-utilized concept of muscle allotypes defines distinct muscle groups that differ in their intrinsic capacity to express novel traits when exposed to a facilitating extrinsic environment. Allotype-specific traits may have significance as determinants of the preferential involvement or sparing of muscle groups that is observed in a variety of neuromuscular diseases. Little is known, however, of the developmental mechanisms underlying the distinctive skeletal muscle allotypes. The lack of appropriate in vitro models, to dissociate the cell autonomous and non-cell autonomous mechanisms behind allotype diversity, has been a barrier to such studies. Here, we derived novel cell lines from the extraocular and hindlimb muscle allotypes and assessed their similarities and differences during early myogenesis using morphologic and gene/protein expression profiling tools. Our data establish that there are fundamental differences in the transcriptional and cellular signaling pathways used by the two myoblast lineages. Taken together, these data show that myoblast lineage plays a significant role in the divergence of the distinctive muscle groups or allotypes.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the American Physiological Society.