| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Department of Neurology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA; Visual Sciences Research Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
2 Department of Neurology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
3 Visual Sciences Research Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
4 The Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
5 Department of Neurology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA; Visual Sciences Research Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA; Visual Sciences Research Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: john.porter{at}case.edu.
Current models in skeletal muscle biology do not fully account for the breadth, causes, and consequences of phenotypic variation among skeletal muscle groups. The muscle allotype concept arose to explain frank differences between limb, masticatory, and extraocular (EOM) muscles, but there is little understanding of the developmental regulation of the skeletal muscle phenotypic range. Here, we used morphologic and DNA microarray analyses to generate a comprehensive temporal profile for rat EOM development. Based upon coordinate regulation of morphologic/gene expression traits with key events in visual, vestibular, and oculomotor system development, we propose a model that the EOM phenotype is a consequence of extrinsic factors, that are unique to its local environment and sensory-motor control system, acting upon a novel myoblast lineage. We identified a broad spectrum of differences between the postnatal transcriptional patterns of EOM and limb muscle allotypes, including numerous transcripts not traditionally associated with muscle fiber/group differences. Several transcription factors were differentially regulated and may be responsible for signaling muscle allotype specificity. Significant differences in cellular energetic mechanisms defined the EOM and limb allotypes. The allotypes were divergent in many other functional transcript classes that remain to be further explored. Taken together, we suggest that the EOM allotype is the consequence of tissue-specific mechanisms that direct expression of a limited number of EOM-specific transcripts and broader, incremental differences in transcripts that are conserved by the two allotypes. This represents an important first step in dissecting allotype-specific regulatory mechanisms that may, in turn, explain differential muscle group sensitivity to a variety of metabolic and neuromuscular diseases.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  V. E. Das and M. J. Mustari Correlation of Cross-Axis Eye Movements and Motoneuron Activity in Non-Human Primates with "A" Pattern Strabismus Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., February 1, 2007; 48(2): 665 - 674. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. Sanoudou, M. A. Corbett, M. Han, M. Ghoddusi, M.-A. T. Nguyen, N. Vlahovich, E. C. Hardeman, and A. H. Beggs Skeletal muscle repair in a mouse model of nemaline myopathy Hum. Mol. Genet., September 1, 2006; 15(17): 2603 - 2612. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. D. Porter, S. Israel, B. Gong, A. P. Merriam, J. Feuerman, S. Khanna, and H. J. Kaminski Distinctive morphological and gene/protein expression signatures during myogenesis in novel cell lines from extraocular and hindlimb muscle Physiol Genomics, February 23, 2006; 24(3): 264 - 275. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Liang and B. Ventura Physiological genomics in PG and beyond: July to September 2005 Physiol Genomics, October 17, 2005; 23(2): 119 - 124. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |
