Physiol. Genomics AJP citation statistics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Physiol. Genomics (December 6, 2005). doi:10.1152/physiolgenomics.00210.2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Tables
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
24/3/235    most recent
00210.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jiang, S.-Y.
Right arrow Articles by Ramachandran, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jiang, S.-Y.
Right arrow Articles by Ramachandran, S.
Submitted on August 16, 2005
Accepted on November 28, 2005

Comparative and evolutionary analysis of genes encoding small GTPases and their activating proteins in eukaryotic genomes

Shu-Ye Jiang1 and Srinivasan Ramachandran1*

1 National University of Singapore, Temasek Life Sciences Laboratory, Singapore, Singapore

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: sri{at}tll.org.sg.

Both small GTPase and its activating protein (GAP) superfamilies exist in various eukaryotes. The small GTPases regulate a wide variety of cellular processes by cycling between active GTP- and inactive GAP-bound conformations. The GAPs promote GTPase inactivation by stimulating the GTP hydrolysis. In this study, we identified 111 small GTPases and 85 GAPs in rice, 65 GAPs in Arabidopsis, 90 small GTPases in D. melanogaster, and 35 GAPs in S. cerevisiae by genome-wide analysis. We then analyzed and compared a total of 498 small GTPases and 422 GAPs from these four eukaryotic and human genomes. Both animals and yeast genomes contained 5 families of small GTPases and their GAPs. However, plants had only 4 of these 5 families due to a lack of the Ras and RasGAP genes. Small GTPases were conserved with common motifs but GAPs exhibited higher and much more rapid divergence. Based on phylogenetic analysis of all small GTPases and GAPs in 5 eukaryotic organisms, we estimated that their ancestors had small sizes of small GTPases and GAPs and their large-scale expansions occurred after the divergence from their ancestors. Further investigation showed that genome duplications represented the major mechanism for such expansions. Non-synonymous substitutions per site (Ka) and synonymous substitutions per site (Ks) analysis showed that most of the divergence due to a positive selection occurred in common ancestors, suggesting a major functional divergence in an ancient era.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the American Physiological Society.