Physiol. Genomics Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Physiol. Genomics (February 24, 2004). doi:10.1152/physiolgenomics.00179.2003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
17/2/170    most recent
00179.2003v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tian, J.
Right arrow Articles by Handa, J. T
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tian, J.
Right arrow Articles by Handa, J. T
Submitted on October 15, 2003
Accepted on February 10, 2004

The Expression of Native and Cultured RPE Grown on Different Matrices

Jane Tian1, Kazuki Ishibashi1, and James T Handa1*

1 Michael Panitch Macular Degeneration Research Laboratory, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutes, Wilmer Eye Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jthanda{at}jhmi.edu.

The purpose of this work was to determine the expression profiles of RPE cells grown on different matrices, and to assess the degree of culture-induced artifact by comparing the profiles to native RPE. Visually confluent ARPE-19 cells were grown on plastic, Matrigel, collagen I, collagen IV, laminin, and fibronectin for 1 week and serum withdrawn for 3 days. Morphologically normal, macular RPE cells were laser capture microdissected from 3 human globes. Total RNA was extracted from 5000 cells, reverse transcribed, and radiolabeled cDNA probes were hybridized to an array containing 4325 known genes. Arrays were assessed by cluster analysis and statistical analysis of microarrays (SAM). Real time RT-PCR was used to validate differentially expressed genes. Despite similar morphology, ARPE-19 demonstrated different expression profiles when grown on different matrices. Cluster analysis showed that cells grown on collagen IV, laminin, and fibronectin had similar profiles that were distinct from cells grown on collagen I. Cells grown on plastic clustered closest to native RPE. This expression pattern was confirmed with supervised cluster analyses. The number of differentially expressed genes, function of differentially expressed genes, and profile of expressed and unexpressed genes suggest that the overall expression profile of cultured cells is significantly different from native RPE. RPE cells grown on collagen IV, laminin, and fibronectin have profiles more similar than cells grown on plastic, Matrigel, or collagen I. The overall mRNA phenotype, however, is different from morphologically normal, native macular RPE.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
IOVSHome page
Y. F. Leung, P. Ma, and J. E. Dowling
Gene Expression Profiling of Zebrafish Embryonic Retinal Pigment Epithelium In Vivo
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., February 1, 2007; 48(2): 881 - 890.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
J Tian, K Ishibashi, S Honda, S A Boylan, L M Hjelmeland, and J T Handa
The expression of native and cultured human retinal pigment epithelial cells grown in different culture conditions
Br. J. Ophthalmol., November 1, 2005; 89(11): 1510 - 1517.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
H. Itaya, V. Gullapalli, I. K. Sugino, M. Tamai, and M. A. Zarbin
Iris Pigment Epithelium Attachment to Aged Submacular Human Bruch's Membrane
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., December 1, 2004; 45(12): 4520 - 4528.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2004 by the American Physiological Society.