Physiol. Genomics Watch the video to see how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Physiol. Genomics (September 2, 2008). doi:10.1152/physiolgenomics.00159.2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Figures
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
35/3/262    most recent
00159.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rosati, B.
Right arrow Articles by McKinnon, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rosati, B.
Right arrow Articles by McKinnon, D.
Submitted on July 17, 2007
Accepted on August 19, 2008

Evolution of Ventricular Myocyte Electrophysiology

Barbara Rosati1, Min Dong2, Lan Cheng3, Shian-Ren Liou4, Qinghong Yan5, Ji Young Park1, Elaine Shiang1, Michael Sanguinetti3, Hong-Sheng Wang6, and David McKinnon7*

1 Physiology and Biophysics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, United States
2 Pharmacology and Cell Biophysics, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
3 Physiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
4 Neurobiology and Behavior, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, United States
5 Neurobiology and Behavior, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook , New York, United States
6 Pharmacology and cell Biophysics, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
7 Department of Neurobiology, SUNY at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, New York, United States; Neurobiology and Behavior, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: dmckinnon{at}notes.cc.sunysb.edu.

The relative importance of regulatory versus structural evolution for the evolution of different biological systems is a subject of controversy. The primacy of regulatory evolution in the diversification of morphological traits has been promoted by many evolutionary developmental biologists. For physiological traits, however, the role of regulatory evolution has received less attention or has been considered to be relatively unimportant. To address this issue for electrophysiological systems, the importance of regulatory and structural evolution in the evolution of the electrophysiological function of cardiac myocytes was examined in mammals. In particular, two related phenomena were studied: the change in action potential morphology in small mammals and the scaling of action potential duration across mammalian phylogeny. In general, the functional properties of the ion channels involved in ventricular action potential repolarization were found to be relatively invariant. In contrast, there were large changes in the expression levels of multiple ion channel and transporter genes. For the Kv2.1 and Kv4.2 potassium channel genes, which are primary determinants of the action potential morphology in small mammals, the functional properties of the proximal promoter regions were found to vary in concordance with species dependent differences in mRNA expression, suggesting that evolution of cis-regulatory elements is the primary determinant of this trait. Scaling of action potential duration was found to be a complex phenomena, involving changes in the expression of a large number of channels and transporters. In this case, it is concluded that regulatory evolution is the predominant mechanism by which the scaling is achieved.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the American Physiological Society.