Physiol. Genomics Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Physiol. Genomics (September 26, 2006). doi:10.1152/physiolgenomics.00108.2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
28/1/62    most recent
00108.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Saama, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, G. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Saama, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, G. W.
Submitted on June 1, 2006
Accepted on September 20, 2006

A Novel Algorithm for Transcriptome Analysis

Peter M. Saama1, Osman V Patel2, Anilkumar Bettegowda2, James J. Ireland2, and George W. Smith2*

1 Genus Plc., Hendersonville, Tennessee, United States
2 Department of Animal Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: smithge7{at}msu.edu.

A growing body of evidence implicates the oocyte as a key regulator of ovarian folliculogenesis and early embryonic development. We have screened bovine cDNA microarrays (containing ESTs representing > 15,000 unique genes) with Cy3 and Cy5 labeled cDNA derived from bovine oocyte samples collected at two different stages of meiotic maturation (germinal vesicle versus metaphase II; n = 3 samples per group). Here, we present a novel data analysis approach that uses all available information from above experiments to obtain and index the transcriptome of bovine oocytes and changes in transcriptome composition in response to meiotic maturation. Signal intensities (Fg) for all house-keeping genes were omitted prior to analysis. A local threshold for gene expression was computed as background intensity (Bg) plus 2 times the standard deviation of background and foreground signals. Within each array, data were normalized using the LOWESS procedure. Subsequently, a two-stage mixed model was fitted to remove systematic variations. In the first stage, the response was the LOWESS normalized Fg with treatment as a fixed effect. In stage two, the residuals from stage one were analyzed in a gene-specific model that included treatment group and spots nested within patch and array. A test for the difference between Least Squares Means (LSM) for the treatment effect was performed. A False Discovery Rate (FDR) adjustment on the p-values for the difference was carried out. This novel algorithm was compared with approaches that ignore the FDR and the threshold described herein and stark differences obtained.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Physiol. GenomicsHome page
J. L. Burton and G. J. M. Rosa
Physiological genomics special issue on animal functional genomics
Physiol Genomics, December 13, 2006; 28(1): 1 - 4.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the American Physiological Society.