Physiol. Genomics Add DOIs to your references at manuscript stage!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Physiol. Genomics (September 19, 2006). doi:10.1152/physiolgenomics.00106.2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
28/1/15    most recent
00106.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rosa, G. J.
Right arrow Articles by Rosa, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rosa, G. J.
Right arrow Articles by Rosa, A.
Submitted on June 1, 2006
Accepted on September 15, 2006

A review of microarray experimental design strategies for genetical genomics studies

Guilherme JM Rosa1*, Natalia de Leon2, and Artur Rosa3

1 Department of Dairy Science, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, United States
2 Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, United States
3 Department of Animal & Range Sciences, South Dakota University, Brookings, South Dakota, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: grosa{at}wisc.edu.

Genetical genomics approaches provide a powerful tool for studying the genetic mechanisms governing variation in complex traits. By combining information on phenotypic traits, pedigree structure, molecular markers and gene expression, such studies can be used for estimating heritability of mRNA transcript abundances, for mapping expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL), and for inferring regulatory gene networks. Microarray experiments, however, can be extremely costly and time consuming, which may limit sample sizes and statistical power. Thus it is crucial to optimize experimental designs by carefully choosing the subjects to be assayed, within a selective profiling approach, and by cautiously controlling systematic factors affecting the system. Also, a rigorous strategy should be used for allocating mRNA samples across assay batches, slides and dye labeling, so that effects of interest are not confounded with nuisance factors. In this presentation, we review some selective profiling strategies for genetical genomics studies, including the selection of individuals for increased genetic dissimilarity and for a higher number of recombination events. Efficient designs for studying epistasis are also discussed, as well as experiments for inferring heritability of transcriptional levels. It is shown that solving an optimal design problem generally requires a numerical implementation, and that the optimality criteria should be intimately related to the goals of the experiment, such as the estimation of additive, dominance and interacting effects, localizing putative eQTL, or inferring genetical and environmental variance components associated with transcriptional abundances.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
L. A. Cogburn, T. E. Porter, M. J. Duclos, J. Simon, S. C. Burgess, J. J. Zhu, H. H. Cheng, J. B. Dodgson, and J. Burnside
Functional Genomics of the Chicken A Model Organism
Poult. Sci., October 1, 2007; 86(10): 2059 - 2094.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. GenomicsHome page
J. L. Burton and G. J. M. Rosa
Physiological genomics special issue on animal functional genomics
Physiol Genomics, December 13, 2006; 28(1): 1 - 4.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the American Physiological Society.