|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Department of Animal Science, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States
2 Department of Animal Science, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, United States
3 Department of Animal Science, University of Minnesota, St Paul, Minnesota, United States
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: yda{at}umn.edu.
Epistasis effects (gene interactions) have been increasingly recognized as important genetic factors underlying complex traits. The existence of a large number of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) provides opportunities and challenges to screen DNA variations affecting complex traits using a candidate gene analysis. In this article, four types of epistasis effects of two candidate gene SNPs with Hardy-Weinberg disequilibrium (HWD) and linkage disequilibrium (LD) are considered: additive x additive, additive x dominance, dominance x additive, and dominance x dominance. The Kempthorne genetic model was chosen for its appealing genetic interpretations of the epistasis effects. The method in this study consists of extension of Kempthorne's definitions of 35 individual genetic effects to allow HWD and LD, genetic contrasts of the 35 extended individual genetic effects to define the four epistasis effects, and a linear model method for testing epistasis effects. Formulae to predict statistical power (as a function of contrast heritability, sample size, and type-I error) and sample size (as a function of contrast heritability, type-I error and type-II error) for detecting each epistasis effect were derived and the theoretical predictions agreed well with simulation studies. The accuracy in estimating each epistasis effect and rates of false positives in the absence of all or three epistasis effects were evaluated using simulations. The method for epistasis testing can be a useful tool to understand the exact mode of epistasis, to assemble genome-wide SNPs into an epistasis network, and to assemble all SNP effects affecting a phenotype using pairwise epistasis tests.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. Barendse, B. E. Harrison, R. J. Hawken, D. M. Ferguson, J. M. Thompson, M. B. Thomas, and R. J. Bunch Epistasis Between Calpain 1 and Its Inhibitor Calpastatin Within Breeds of Cattle Genetics, August 1, 2007; 176(4): 2601 - 2610. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Burton and G. J. M. Rosa Physiological genomics special issue on animal functional genomics Physiol Genomics, December 13, 2006; 28(1): 1 - 4. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |