Physiol. Genomics Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Physiol. Genomics (August 22, 2006). doi:10.1152/physiolgenomics.00023.2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Figure
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
27/3/237    most recent
00023.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by da Silva, G. J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Krieger, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by da Silva, G. J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Krieger, J. E.
Submitted on February 11, 2006
Accepted on August 17, 2006

Ace gene dosage modulates pressure-induced cardiac hypertrophy in mice and men

Gustavo J. J. da Silva1, Edson D Moreira1, Alexandre C Pereira1, Jose G Mill2, Eduardo M. Krieger1, and Jose E. Krieger1*

1 Lab Genet & Mol Cardiol/Medicine, Heart Institute (InCor)/Univ Sao Paulo Med Sch, Sao Paulo, Brazil
2 Dept Physiology, Univ Fed Espirito Santo, Vitoria, Espirito Santo, Brazil

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: krieger{at}incor.usp.br.

The influence of genetic factors on complex phenotypes is context dependent, posing a challenge to quantify the role of single gene variants on this process. Moreover, redundancy and reserve capacity among control systems prevents most physiological stimuli to destabilize these processes. To test whether small gene perturbation can disrupt this equilibrium under pathological conditions, mice harboring 1, 2 or 3 copies of the Ace gene were submitted to 3 and 6 weeks of pressure overload (PO). Direct systolic blood pressure (SBP), as an index of cardiac afterload, and left ventricle mass index (LVMI) were measured. LVMI under normotension was the same regardless of the Ace genotype but the slopes of the LVMI/SBP curves increased in the 3 vs. 1-copy group by about 50% upon 3 or 6- week PO. Angiotensin II AT1 receptor blocker treatment produced a significant pressure independent decrease in the LVMI/SBP ratio. Unlike the 1-copy group, PO resulted in a significant reduction in angiotensinogen and an increase in Ace mRNA expression accompanied by an increase in cardiac angiotensin II levels in the 3-copy group. Similarly, the human ACE D gene variant influenced cardiac mass, estimated by Sokolov-Lyon index, in a sample of 1507 individuals from an urban population only in individuals in the 4th quartile of the blood pressure distribution. Collectively, these data provide direct evidence that Ace gene dosage per se does not influence cardiac mass but upon a pathological stimulus, such as elevation in blood pressure, it modulates cardiac mass in both mice and humans.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the American Physiological Society.