|
|
||||||||
Department of Physiology and Molecular Medicine, Medical College of Ohio, Toledo, Ohio 43614
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
hypertension; quantitative trait loci; genetic hypertension
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Congenic substrains from S.LEW(5) were constructed by crossing S.LEW(5) to S, and the F1 were intercrossed to yield a large F2 population. DNA of F2 rats was extracted from tail biopsy tissue using the DNeasy 96 Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Chartsworth, CA), and genotypes of microsatellite markers throughout the congenic region were obtained as done previously (6, 8, 10). Rats showing useful recombinant chromosomes in the congenic region were crossed to S to duplicate the recombinant chromosome, and the offspring were selectively bred by at least two generations of brother-sister mating to fix the recombinant chromosome in the homozygous state on the S background. The original congenic S.LEW(5) was the product of eight backcrosses (not counting the F1 as a backcross). The first subset of congenic strains developed from S.LEW(5) shown in Fig. 1 are the product of at least nine backcrosses, and the second set of congenic substrains in Fig. 2 developed from the first subset are the product of at least 10 backcrosses. After 10 backcrosses the genomic contribution of LEW rats outside the congenic region on average will be 1.7 cM scattered across all chromosomes.
|
|
The chromosome 5 linkage maps were made using the MAPMAKER/EXP program (Whitehead Institute, Cambridge, MA) (17, 18). Rat microsatellite markers were obtained from Research Genetics (Huntsville, AL) or synthesized based on sequence data in the literature (5, 16, 28, 30). For comparative mapping of the QTL region across species, all of the genes that map to our QTL region in mouse and human were checked for the availability of rat sequence data. If rat sequence was available for any gene that mapped to the QTL region in mouse or human, then a primer set was developed and placed on the rat radiation hybrid map. The genes placed on the rat radiation hybrid map in this way were Pde4b, Nrd1, Cpt2, Urod, Ugn, Ppt, and Glur7. A marker for Jun was from Chua et al. (3). The radiation hybrid map was constructed using data obtained from the Rat Genome Database at the Medical College of Wisconsin (http://www.rgd.mcw.edu) and the Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics (http://www.well.ox.ac.uk/rat_mapping_resources). Markers not already on the radiation hybrid map from these two sources, including markers denoted as D5Mco (Medical College of Ohio microsatellite markers) and genes Jun, Pde4b, Nrd1, Cpt2, Urod, Ugn, Ppt, and Glur7, were mapped by testing all 106 samples in the rat radiation hybrid panel (Research Genetics). Primers for these markers are on our website (http://www.mco.edu/depts/physiology/research). The regions in mouse and human homologous to our blood pressure QTL region were identified using the Mouse Genome Informatics database (http://www.informatics.jax.org) and Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM) at The National Center for Biotechnology (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Unfortunately, S.LEW(5) x 5 is shorter at both ends than S.LEW(5) x 6. This arose because when S.LEW(5) x 5 was constructed, inadequate markers were available to monitor the upper end of this congenic segment. Thus looking only at these strains from the technical standpoint, the QTL could be either in the upper differential segment between markers D5Uwm12 and D5Uwm14, or in the lower differential segment between markers D5Uwm31 and D5Rjr1. Figure 1, however, also shows the 2-LOD interval for the QTL from our genome scan (10) (LOD, "logarithm of the odds ratio"). This 2-LOD interval includes the lower segment between D5Uwm31 and D5Rjr1, but the upper segment between D5Uwm12 and D5Uwm14 is >30 cM outside of the 2-LOD interval (Fig. 1). Thus the lower segment is the more rational target for the QTL. This is confirmed by congenic segments coming from the bottom of Fig. 1. Strain S.LEW(5) x 3 crosses the putative QTL region and shows a significant effect of lowering blood pressure relative to S rats. The shorter strain from the bottom S.LEW(5) x 2 obviously does not contain the target QTL, because it does not lower blood pressure relative to S; quite the opposite, it raises blood pressure slightly relative to S. Thus the differential segment defined by S.LEW(5) x 3 and S.LEW(5) x 2 reinforces the location of the QTL as indicated in Fig. 1, where it is designated as QTL 1.
Figure 2 shows a second iteration of four congenic substrains constructed from strain S.LEW(5) x 6 to better define the QTL 1 region defined in Fig. 1 between D5Uwm31 and D5Rjr1. Interestingly, the shortest congenic segments spanning the target QTL 1 region, i.e., strains S.LEW(5) x 6 x 10 and S.LEW(5) x 6 x 11 showed only marginally significant blood pressure effects of 6 to 8 mmHg lower than S (Fig. 2), not the robust response of
20 mmHg expected based on the data in Fig. 1. But, as the congenic segment was made longer in the proximal direction, i.e., strains S.LEW(5) x 6 x 9 and S.LEW(5) x 6 x 6, the major significant blood pressure effect of 20 mmHg similar to the progenitor strain S.LEW(5) x 6 was again observed (Fig. 2).
The above situation implies the existence of a second QTL in the region proximal to QTL 1. The location of such a QTL can be deduced from the data in Fig. 2. Consider for a moment only the data from the second iteration strains S.LEW(5) x 6 x 6, S.LEW(5) x 6 x 9, S.LEW(5) x 6 x 10, and S.LEW(5) x 6 x 11. The two shortest strains lack the significant blood pressure effect seen in the two longer strains. The differential segment between strains S.LEW(5) x 6 x 9 and S.LEW(5) x 6 x 10 defines the position of a QTL. This is labeled "QTL 2" in Fig. 2 and lies between markers D5Rat154 and D5Uia8. Note, however, that analogous to the situation with QTL 1, the existence of QTL 2 is not confirmed by strain S.LEW(5) x 5, which crosses the QTL 2 region but largely lacks the QTL 1 segment.
Final consideration of Fig. 2 shows that 1) strains with congenic segments that contain only QTL 1 or QTL 2 do not show a blood pressure effect and 2) strains with congenic segments that contain both QTL 1 and QTL 2 do show a marked blood pressure effect. This implies that QTL 1 and QTL 2 alleles from the LEW genome are both required to create an observable QTL effect on chromosome 5 in the S vs. LEW comparison.
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The telomeric region around ANP was shown to be associated with blood pressure in linkage studies using spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) crossed to Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) (32, 33). This region is, however, clearly distinct from the congenic region studied here in Dahl rats. The telomeric region was also linked to stroke latency in a cross of stroke-prone SHR (SHRSP) and SHR (25) and more recently with cardiac hypertrophy in a cross of WKY and hyperactive WKY (WKY HA) (7).
The central region of rat chromosome 5 was of initial interest to us, because genetic markers for endothelin-2 (Edn2) were associated with blood pressure in our F2 (S x LEW) studies (4, 10). And, of course, the construction of the congenic strain (10) used here as starting material established the existence of a blood pressure QTL. Edn2 is eliminated as a candidate gene in the present work, however, because it is well outside of the QTL region defined by the congenic substrains (Fig. 1).
The central chromosome 5 region is also of interest to others studying the effects of arachidonic acid metabolites on renal function in Dahl S rats (27) or SHR (28), because the cytochromes P-450 producing biologically active products from arachidonic acid are in the central region of chromosome 5. The marker D5Rjr1 developed by Stec et al. (28), which spans a repeated element in the P450A1 locus (28), is at the very edge, but outside of, our congenic region as defined by the distal end of congenic substrain S.LEW(5) x 6 in Fig. 1. The central region of rat chromosome 5 has also been associated with a stroke phenotype in a cross of SHRSP and WKY (15). The phenotype was the infarct size following ligation of the distal middle cerebral artery. In this study, no blood pressure effect was seen colocalizing with the stroke infarct size phenotype, possibly because the rats were not challenged with a high-salt diet.
Our data imply that the two closely linked blood pressure QTL in the central part of rat chromosome 5 interact, since both were required for a significant blood pressure effect, but neither alone gave a significant effect. We have previously seen that multiple, largely additive, blood pressure QTL reside on the same chromosome and are detected by the construction of a series of congenic strains. This was observed using Dahl rats for chromosome 1 (26), chromosome 2 (11), and chromosome 10 (12) and using SHR for chromosome 1 (9). It can be argued that the appearance of a large effect QTL in linkage analysis is likely to be due to the clustering of more than one causative locus. This certainly makes identification of individual loci more difficult, as a large effect QTL breaks up into multiple loci, each of which individually has a small effect or no effect due to the requirement for the presence of specific alleles at linked loci.
Potentially interacting loci on the same chromosome have also been observed using congenic strains for phenotypes other than blood pressure. In the non-obese diabetic (NOD) mouse, three linked loci on mouse chromosome 6 (24) and three linked loci on mouse chromosome 3 (19) have been described for controlling insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Iakoubova et al. (14) also presented data interpreted to indicate two linked loci both contributing to the severity of recessive polycystic kidney disease in the mouse.
With two linked interactive QTL, the problem arises as how best to localize each one. If the ability to observe one depends on the presence of the other, then obviously a congenic strain spanning both can be shortened progressively from each end. This will hold one QTL constant while localizing the other. This is essentially what was done in mapping a cluster of QTL for diabetes in the NOD mouse (19).
Figure 3 shows a rat radiation hybrid map of our congenic region and comparative regions for mouse chromosome 4 and the corresponding human cytogenic locations of known genes on the rat radiation hybrid map. Two genome scans for linkage to blood pressure have been done in the mouse. In one study (29), using a backcross population derived from C57BL/6J and A/J mice, the strongest blood pressure QTL was seen on mouse chromosome 4, with peaks at mouse markers D4Mit214 and D4Mit164. These markers are at positions 18 and 28 cM, respectively, on mouse chromosome 4 and are clearly far from our rat QTL, which corresponds to the region of mouse chromosome 4 from 44 to 52 cM (Fig. 3). Another genome scan in mice using strains of hypertensive mice selectively bred for high and low blood pressure and including crosses to Mus spretus did not detect a blood pressure QTL on mouse chromosome 4 (31).
|
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: J. P. Rapp, Dept. of Physiology and Molecular Medicine, Medical College of Ohio, 3035 Arlington Ave., Toledo, OH 43614-5804 (E-mail: jrapp{at}mco.edu).
10.1152/physiolgenomics.00080.2001.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. Joe, Y. Saad, N. H. Lee, B. C. Frank, O. H. Achinike, T. V. Luu, K. Gopalakrishnan, E. J. Toland, P. Farms, S. Yerga-Woolwine, et al. Positional identification of variants of Adamts16 linked to inherited hypertension Hum. Mol. Genet., August 1, 2009; 18(15): 2825 - 2838. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Flint and T. F.C. Mackay Genetic architecture of quantitative traits in mice, flies, and humans Genome Res., May 1, 2009; 19(5): 723 - 733. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Williams, A. Sarkis, K. M. Hoagland, K. Fredrich, R. P. Ryan, C. Moreno, B. Lopez, J. Lazar, F. J. Fenoy, M. Sharma, et al. Transfer of the CYP4A region of chromosome 5 from Lewis to Dahl S rats attenuates renal injury Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, December 1, 2008; 295(6): F1764 - F1777. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. H. Lee, B. J. Haas, N. E. Letwin, B. C. Frank, T. V. Luu, Q. Sun, C. D. House, S. Yerga-Woolwine, P. Farms, E. Manickavasagam, et al. Cross-Talk of Expression Quantitative Trait Loci Within 2 Interacting Blood Pressure Quantitative Trait Loci Hypertension, December 1, 2007; 50(6): 1126 - 1133. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Y. Deng Genetic basis of polygenic hypertension Hum. Mol. Genet., October 15, 2007; 16(R2): R195 - R202. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Lee, J. Liu, A. M. Westcott, J. A. Vieth, S. J. DeRaedt, S. Yang, B. Joe, and G. T. Cicila Substitution Mapping in Dahl Rats Identifies Two Distinct Blood Pressure Quantitative Trait Loci Within 1.12- and 1.25-Mb Intervals on Chromosome 3 Genetics, December 1, 2006; 174(4): 2203 - 2213. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Roman, K. M. Hoagland, B. Lopez, A. E. Kwitek, M. R. Garrett, J. P. Rapp, J. Lazar, H. J. Jacob, and A. Sarkis Characterization of blood pressure and renal function in chromosome 5 congenic strains of Dahl S rats Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, June 1, 2006; 290(6): F1463 - F1471. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Mott Finding the molecular basis of complex genetic variation in humans and mice Phil Trans R Soc B, March 29, 2006; 361(1467): 393 - 401. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Gauguier, J. Behmoaras, K. Argoud, S. P. Wilder, C. Pradines, M. T. Bihoreau, M. Osborne-Pellegrin, and M. P. Jacob Chromosomal Mapping of Quantitative Trait Loci Controlling Elastin Content in Rat Aorta Hypertension, March 1, 2005; 45(3): 460 - 466. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Mein, M. J. Caulfield, R. J. Dobson, and P. B. Munroe Genetics of essential hypertension Hum. Mol. Genet., April 1, 2004; 13(90001): R169 - 175. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. W. McBride, F. J. Charchar, D. Graham, W. H. Miller, P. Strahorn, F. J. Carr, and A. F. Dominiczak Functional genomics in rodent models of hypertension J. Physiol., January 1, 2004; 554(1): 56 - 63. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. W. McBride, F. J. Carr, D. Graham, N. H. Anderson, J. S. Clark, W. K. Lee, F. J. Charchar, M. J. Brosnan, and A. F. Dominiczak Microarray Analysis of Rat Chromosome 2 Congenic Strains Hypertension, March 1, 2003; 41(3): 847 - 853. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |