|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Department of Physiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
2 Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
blood pressure; glucocorticoids; gene expression; gene therapy; RNA interference
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Programmatic efforts have been undertaken to generate consomic and congenic variants of the SS rat that may facilitate the study of the molecular pathophysiology of salt-sensitive hypertension (5, 6, 10). These efforts are important since the rat strains commonly used as controls for SS in physiological studies may contain many molecular differences from the SS rat that are unrelated to the hypertension phenotype. In one of the consomic strains generated, SS-13BN, chromosome 13 is the only chromosome that is of the Brown Norway origin, making SS-13BN genetically 98% identical to SS. Yet the blood pressure salt sensitivity is substantially reduced in SS-13BN (10). SS-13BN has become a valuable control strain for the study of the SS model (5, 6, 10, 13, 42).
We previously used cDNA microarrays to examine renal medullary gene expression profiles in SS and SS-13BN rats on diets containing 0.4 or 4% NaCl (22, 24, 25). It was found that following 3 days of dietary high-salt exposure, 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 (11β-HSD1) mRNA expression was decreased in the renal medulla of SS-13BN rats to
35% of the level seen on the 0.4% NaCl diet but did not change significantly in SS rats (22, 24). 11β-HSD1 converts inactive glucocorticoids (11-dehydrocorticosterone in rodents and cortisone in human) to active glucocorticoids (corticosterone in rodents and cortisol in human) (46). Experimental overexpression of 11β-HSD1 in the adipose tissue or the liver in mice led to the development of hypertension (28, 31).
A critical question that has not been addressed is whether abnormalities of endogenous 11β-HSD1 contribute functionally to any common forms of hypertension. The hypothesis of the present study was that the inability of the SS rat to suppress the renal medullary level of 11β-HSD1 expression contributed to salt-induced hypertension. We used a number of new approaches, including gene knockdown locally in the renal medulla, to test this hypothesis.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Animals.
Male SS and consomic SS-13BN rats were generated as described previously (10, 25, 42). Rats were maintained on a purified AIN-76A rodent diet (Dyets, Bethlehem, PA) containing 0.4% NaCl and had free access to water. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were from Harlan (Indianapolis, IN). The animal protocols were approved by the Medical College of Wisconsin Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.
Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.
Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis of corticosterone and 11-dehydrocorticosterone was performed using a reversed-phase analytical column and an API 4000 Q-trap tandem mass spectrometer as described previously (47). In some experiments, corticosterone was measured with enzyme immunoassay.
RNA extraction and real-time PCR.
Renal regional tissues were collected and RNA was extracted as described previously (24, 25, 43). Real-time PCR analysis using the Taqman chemistry was performed as described previously (21, 23, 27). 18S rRNA was used as an internal normalizer.
Small interfering RNA.
Small interfering RNA (siRNA) was designed and synthesized similar to that described previously (23, 26, 27). The rat 11β-HSD1 target sequence was 5'-aagcaaucagagguugggucauu-3'. Control siRNA targeting luciferase was from Dharmacon (Lafayette, CO).
Acute renal medullary interstitial injection.
The left kidney was exposed through a flank incision. Approximately 200 µl of siRNA preparation (20 µg) were injected over 1 min through a PE-10 tubing inserted into the renal medulla. The tubing was removed after injection. In some experiments, siRNA was combined with Optison microbubbles (1:1), and ultrasound (2.2 W/cm2, 1 MHz, and 20% duty cycle) (41) was applied on the kidney surface for 5 min after the injection. In other experiments, siRNA was combined with 12 µl of Oligofectamine (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA).
Acute intraureter injection.
The left ureter was exposed through a midline incision. Urine flow was temporarily stopped. siRNA was injected into the ureter to allow retrograde diffusion into the kidney. Oligofectamine was used in some experiments.
Small hairpin RNA plasmid.
Small hairpin RNA (shRNA) targeting rat 11β-HSD1 and a control shRNA containing two nucleotide substitutions were designed, cloned, and prepared as described previously (27). The 11β-HSD1 target sequence was 5'-aauaccacaugggcucccauu-3'. The two underlined nucleotides were swapped for the control shRNA.
Renal medullary interstitial injection of shRNA with polyethylenimine.
The rats were uninephrectomized, and a catheter was implanted in the renal medulla as described previously (29, 42, 47)
2 wk prior to the injection. shRNA plasmids (100 µg) were combined with in vivo-jetPEI (PolyPlus, New York, NY) at a ratio of 8 following the manufacturer's instructions and injected into the catheter over 1 min. In vivo-jetPEI is a polyethylenimine designed for in vivo transfection (1, 12).
Chronic measurement of arterial blood pressure.
Chronic monitoring of arterial blood pressure in freely moving rats using indwelling femoral arterial catheters was performed as described previously (29, 42, 47).
Statistical analysis.
Data were analyzed by Student's t-test, paired t-test, or analysis of variance followed by Holm-Sidak test. P < 0.05 was considered significant. Data shown are means ± SE.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
45%, in the level of renal medullary 11β-HSD1 mRNA in SS-13BN rats in response to an increase in dietary salt intake, which was not observed in SS rats. The data confirmed the finding of previous cDNA microarray and Northern blot analyses (24). Renal cortical expression of 11β-HSD1 in SS-13BN rats did not change significantly.
|
The urinary level of active glucocorticoids was higher in SS than in SS-13BN.
The higher expression level of 11β-HSD1 suggested that the kidneys of SS rats might contain increased levels of corticosterone. To test the possibility, we collected 24 h urine from SS and SS-13BN rats that had been exposed to the high-salt diet for 3 days. As shown in Fig. 2A, the corticosterone/11-dehydrocorticosterone ratio in the urine was significantly higher in SS rats compared with SS-13BN rats. The average ratio in SS rats was 1.5. Moreover, urinary concentrations of corticosterone (Fig. 2B) or 24 h urinary excretion of corticosterone were significantly higher in SS rats. The 24 h urine volume was not significantly different between the two rat strains [48 ± 5 ml/24 h in SS, 46 ± 4 ml/24 in SS-13BN, n = 5, not significant (NS)]. The difference in urinary excretion of corticosterone appeared to have originated locally from the kidneys because plasma concentrations of corticosterone were similar in SS and SS-13BN rats (Fig. 2C). Urinary volume or concentration or excretion of corticosterone was not significantly different between SS and SS-13BN on the 0.4% NaCl diet (114 ± 13 ng/24 h in SS, 95 ± 8 ng/24 h in SS-13BN, n = 5, NS).
|
We examined several ways of delivering 11β-HSD1 siRNA into the renal medulla in Sprague-Dawley rats. At 3 days after injection, rat kidneys receiving 20 µg siRNA targeting 11β-HSD1 delivered through a medullary interstitial injection combined with the ultrasound/microbubble treatment or through an intraureter injection combined with Oligofectamine exhibited a statistically significant reduction of
45% in 11β-HSD1 mRNA expression in the renal medulla (Fig. 3). The effect was confined to the renal medulla, as 11β-HSD1 mRNA levels in the renal cortex were not significantly altered. 11β-HSD1 mRNA levels in the contralateral, uninfused kidneys were not affected either. Expression of 11β-HSD2, the isoform that inactivates glucocorticoids, was not affected by siRNA targeting 11β-HSD1 (Fig. 3).
|
25% reduction in 11β-HSD1 mRNA expression in the renal medulla (Fig. 3), but the reduction did not reach statistical significance. Renal interstitial injection of the siRNA alone did not result in appreciable reduction.
siRNA targeting renal medullary 11β-HSD1 attenuated the early phase of salt-induced hypertension in SS rats.
The siRNA targeting 11β-HSD1 or a control siRNA was delivered into the remaining kidney of uninephrectomized SS or SS-13BN rats through renal interstitial injection combined with the ultrasound/microbubble treatment. Uninephrectomy and arterial catheterization were performed on day 0, siRNA injection on day 10, the dietary content of NaCl increased from 0.4 to 4% on day 13, and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) recorded on days 1, 3, and 5 after the dietary change.
As shown in Fig. 4A, SS rats treated with 11β-HSD1 siRNA and the control siRNA had similar levels of MAP of
130 mmHg on day 1 following the switch to the 4% NaCl diet. On day 3 of the 4% NaCl diet, the MAP of SS rats treated with the control siRNA was increased by 25 mmHg to 156 ± 4 mmHg. In contrast, the increase of MAP was significantly attenuated in SS rats treated with 11β-HSD1 siRNA, reaching only 143 ± 4 mmHg (P < 0.05 vs. control siRNA). On day 5 of the 4% NaCl diet, however, MAP was increased to similar levels in SS rats treated with either control (159 ± 5 mmHg) or 11β-HSD1 siRNA (153 ± 7 mmHg, NS vs. control siRNA). The same siRNA treatment did not have any significant effects on the blood pressure of SS-13BN rats (Fig. 4B).
|
shRNA targeting renal medullary 11β-HSD1 led to a long-term attenuation of salt-induced hypertension in SS rats.
The effect of siRNA on salt-induced hypertension in SS rats was restricted to the early phase. We suspected that the effect was transient because chemically synthesized siRNA had a short lifetime in the tissue. We examined the effect of targeting 11β-HSD1 with a shRNA plasmid that might have a longer lifetime than siRNA. In vitro studies showed that the 11β-HSD1 shRNA plasmid, but not the control shRNA with two nucleotide substitutions, was highly effective in silencing 11β-HSD1 expression in cultured cells (27), supporting the efficiency of the 11β-HSD1 shRNA.
shRNA (100 µg) was combined with in vivo-jetPEI and injected into the renal medulla through a chronically implanted catheter. Uninephrectomy was performed on day 0, arterial and renal medullary interstitial catheters implanted on day 10, daily recording of MAP started on day 17, shRNA injected and the dietary NaCl content increased from 0.4% to 4% on day 21, and MAP recorded daily for another 11 days.
As shown in Fig. 5A, shRNA targeting 11β-HSD1 resulted in a statistically significant, long-term amelioration of salt-induced hypertension in SS rats. MAP began to diverge between the two groups of rats 3 days after the injection of shRNA and the start of the 4% NaCl diet. MAP was significantly lower in the group receiving 11β-HSD1 shRNA 7 days after the start of the 4% NaCl diet (144 ± 4 mmHg vs. 157 ± 5 mmHg in the group receiving the control shRNA). The difference in MAP remained significant for several more days and reached
20 mmHg. 11β-HSD1 shRNA did not lower MAP in SS-13BN rats (Fig. 5A). Curiously, there was a slight increase of MAP in SS-13BN treated with 11β-HSD1 shRNA toward the end of the recording period.
|
An additional group of SS rats was prepared to examine the effect of 11β-HSD1 shRNA on the levels of 11β-HSD1 protein and urinary corticosterone at 6 days after the shRNA treatment. The 6-day time point was immediately prior to the detection of significant differences in MAP. As shown in Fig. 5B, the protein level of 11β-HSD1 in the outer medulla was significantly reduced by 11β-HSD1 shRNA by >40%. Corticosterone concentrations in 24 h urine samples tended to be decreased by 11β-HSD1 shRNA (6.6 ± 2.7 ng/ml in the 11β-HSD1 shRNA group vs. 11.1 ± 1.9 ng/ml in the control shRNA group, n = 5–6), although the difference did not reach statistical significance. Urine flow rates were not significantly altered by 11β-HSD1 shRNA (44 ± 6 ml/24 h in the 11β-HSD1 shRNA group, 47 ± 5 ml/24 h in the control shRNA group, NS).
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The importance of 11β-HSDs in the regulation of arterial blood pressure was first recognized when 11β-HSD2, which inactivates glucocorticoids, was found to be critical in protecting mineralocorticoid receptors in the distal nephron from stimulation by glucocorticoids (18, 36). Pharmacological inhibition or genetic deficiency of 11β-HSD2 leads to the development of hypertension (48). Studies in the last few years indicated that 11β-HSD1, which reactivates glucocorticoids, might also play an important role in blood pressure regulation. Overexpression of 11β-HSD1 specifically in the adipose tissue or the liver caused hypertension in mice, which might be due to activation of the angiotensin pathway (28, 31). Variants of 11β-HSD1 have been reported to be associated with the risk of hypertension in Pima Indians (17).
There was an ongoing interest in the role of 11β-HSDs in Dahl salt-sensitive hypertension. However, no conclusive functional evidence had been reported prior to the present study. Dehydrogenase, or glucocorticoid inactivating, activities of 11β-HSDs were reported to be generally lower in SS rats than in Dahl salt-resistant rats (16, 40). The urinary corticosterone/11-dehydrocorticosterone ratio, measured by a radioimmunoassay, was higher in SS rats than in Dahl salt-resistant rats (39). The mRNA levels of 11β-HSD1 and 11β-HSD2, however, were found to be similar in SS rats and Dahl salt-resistant rats (15). 11β-HSD1 is expressed in the kidney (2, 35), but the functional significance of renal 11β-HSD1 is virtually unknown.
We used consomic SS-13BN rats, instead of Dahl salt-resistant rats, as the control for SS. The comparison with SS-13BN rats allowed us to identify an inability of SS rats to suppress 11β-HSD1 in response to salt. It was consistent with the higher corticosterone/11-dehydrocorticosterone ratio in the urine. Knockdown of 11β-HSD1 specifically in the renal medulla using siRNA or shRNA provided strong evidence for the elusive functional role of 11β-HSD1 in Dahl salt-sensitive hypertension. Urinary corticosterone levels appeared to be decreased following 11β-HSD1 silencing and the high-salt treatment. It suggested, but did not prove, that 11β-HSD1 in the renal medulla of SS rats was a reductase. It would be interesting to further analyze the biochemistry of 11β-HSD1 and the related metabolism in SS and SS-13BN rats, particularly following 11β-HSD1 silencing and a high-salt challenge.
The shRNA experiment, compared with the siRNA experiment, included three technical advantages in addition to the longer-term efficacy of shRNA. First, the shRNA was designed to target a different region of 11β-HSD1 mRNA than the siRNA. Second, a shRNA containing two nucleotide substitutions was used as control. These two advantages helped to reduce any concerns about off-target effects of RNA interference (14). Third, a polymer reagent designed for in vivo transfection was used, which allowed us to inject shRNA into a chronically implanted catheter and avoid the anesthesia required for ultrasound treatment.
11β-HSD1 shRNA reduced the blood pressure of SS rats on the high-salt diet by
15–20 mmHg. The modesty of the effect is probably a reflection of the nature of the SS model. Dahl SS hypertension is widely considered a polygenic model (5, 33), as opposed to models of single gene diseases. The polygenic nature may be the strength of the SS model since human salt-sensitive forms of hypertension are also likely to be polygenic (33). The implication, however, is that any single molecular pathway will contribute at best to a fraction of the hypertensive phenotype.
Our general hypothesis is that the molecules and pathways involved in the pathophysiology of Dahl SS hypertension, and perhaps other polygenic, complex diseases, form a tree-like structure. Causal genes containing genetic variations resemble numerous leaves on the tree. The genetic variations interact with environmental factors and impact on various molecular pathways and intermediate mechanisms, represented by small branches on the tree. The intermediate mechanisms converge gradually to form larger branches, or shared pathways. Correcting abnormalities in an intermediate pathway, such as that involving 11β-HSD1, would, therefore, be expected to have modest effects on the overall phenotype.
Two important questions arise from the results of the present study and deserve further investigation in future studies. First, how does the apparent excess of glucocorticoids in the kidneys contribute to salt-induced hypertension in the SS rat? One possibility is that excess glucocorticoids stimulate mineralocorticoid receptors, similar to that occurs with 11β-HSD2 deficiencies. However, 11β-HSD1 protein seems to be localized in proximal tubules and interstitial cells (2, 35), rather than the distal nephron where mineralocorticoid receptors are expressed. A recent study indicated that hexose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase, which provides the NADPH needed for the reductase activity of 11β-HSD1, was not readily detectable in renal inner medullary interstitial cells (19). 11β-HSD1 located in other cells might be involved in the effect seen in the present study since knockdown of 11β-HSD1 significantly decreased (3 days after the siRNA treatment) or tended to decrease (6 days after the shRNA treatment) urinary concentrations of corticosterone.
Another possibility is that excess glucocorticoids may suppress endothelial nitric oxide synthase as we recently demonstrated (26). It is also possible that excess glucocorticoids may exacerbate oxidative stress (20). Nitric oxide deficiencies as well as oxidative stress in the renal medulla have been shown in physiological studies to contribute to Dahl SS hypertension (8, 30, 42). Yet another possibility is that excess glucocorticoids might upregulate local expression of angiotensinogen in the renal medulla, reminiscent of the observations in mice overexpressing 11β-HSD1 (28, 31). We recently found that angiotensinogen expression in the renal medulla was upregulated by a high-salt diet in SS rats but downregulated in SS-13BN rats (44).
Second, why is the SS rat unable to suppress renal medullary expression of 11β-HSD1 in response to an increase in dietary salt intake? 11β-HSD1 is located on chromosome 13, the chromosome that is substituted in SS-13BN, but we do not have genetic evidence to support the presence of different 11β-HSD1 alleles in SS and SS-13BN. It is possible that the inability of the SS rat to suppress 11β-HSD1 is the result of deficiencies in upstream genes or pathways that modulate the responsiveness of 11β-HSD1 expression. The key data point in the present study is that experimental suppression of 11β-HSD1 was sufficient to attenuate salt-induced hypertension in SS rats, mimicking the changes seen in SS-13BN rats. It does not mean that suppression of 11β-HSD1 is required for achieving salt resistance. For instance, a high-salt diet did not significantly alter renal interstitial levels of corticosterone or corticosterone/11-dehydrocorticosterone ratio in salt-insensitive Sprague-Dawley rats (47).
Genomic context may play an important role in determining the pathophysiological role of 11β-HSD1 or any other molecular pathways. A gene or pathway that is important for a phenotype in a given genomic-environmental context might not be important in another genomic-environmental context. Different genes or pathways may very well underlie the salt-resistance phenotype in different strains of animals, just as various animal models of hypertension may develop hypertension due to different mechanisms. This is consistent with the complex, polygenic nature of the blood pressure phenotype in humans. One would not expect all patients of essential hypertension to share the same genetic and molecular defects or all normotensive subjects to share the same protective mechanism.
| GRANTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
1 The online version of this article contains supplemental material. ![]()
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Liang, Y. Liu, D. Mladinov, A. W. Cowley Jr., H. Trivedi, Y. Fang, X. Xu, X. Ding, and Z. Tian MicroRNA: a new frontier in kidney and blood pressure research Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, September 1, 2009; 297(3): F553 - F558. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Tian, Y. Liu, K. Usa, D. Mladinov, Y. Fang, X. Ding, A. S. Greene, A. W. Cowley Jr, and M. Liang Novel Role of Fumarate Metabolism in Dahl-Salt Sensitive Hypertension Hypertension, August 1, 2009; 54(2): 255 - 260. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |