Physiol. Genomics Journal of Neurophysiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Physiol. Genomics 31: 483-491, 2007. First published September 11, 2007; doi:10.1152/physiolgenomics.00118.2007
1094-8341/07 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
31/3/483    most recent
00118.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aluru, N.
Right arrow Articles by Vijayan, M. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Aluru, N.
Right arrow Articles by Vijayan, M. M.
Received 30 May 2007; accepted in final form 5 September 2007.
Physiological Genomics 31:483-491 (2007)
1094-8341/06 $8.00 © 2007 American Physiological Society

Hepatic transcriptome response to glucocorticoid receptor activation in rainbow trout

Neelakanteswar Aluru and Mathilakath M. Vijayan

Department of Biology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada


   ABSTRACT
TOP
 ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Cortisol, the principal corticosteroid in teleosts, is thought to play a key role in the metabolic adjustments critical for regaining homeostasis. However, the target tissue molecular mechanisms involved in this adaptive response to corticosteroid stimulation are still unclear. Cortisol signaling is mediated predominantly by the glucocorticoid receptor (GR), and previous studies have shown that RU486 (a GR antagonist) offsets corticosteroid signaling in teleosts. To elucidate the molecular basis of GR-mediated metabolic readjustments, we exposed primary culture of trout hepatocytes in vitro to cortisol (to mimic stressed levels seen in fish), RU486, or a combination of both for 24 h. The gene expression was analyzed using a low-density custom-made rainbow trout cDNA array enriched with endocrine-, metabolic-, and stress-related genes. The microarray results for select genes were further validated using quantitative real-time PCR. Cortisol treatment significantly increased glucose production in hepatocytes, and this response was blocked by RU486, confirming GR-mediated corticosteroid signaling. Cortisol also elevated GR transcript levels, and this response was abolished by RU486, whereas both cortisol and RU486, either alone or in combination, reduced GR protein content in trout hepatocytes. Cortisol treatment significantly modulated the expression of several genes known to be involved in intermediary metabolism, cellular stress response, reproduction, and xenobiotic metabolism. Most of these cortisol-mediated transcript changes were abolished in the presence of RU486, suggesting a key role for GR-specific signaling in this adaptive response. Taken together, our results suggest a key role for genomic cortisol signaling in the liver molecular reprogramming that is critical for coping with stress in fish.

RU486; cortisol; fish; Oncorhynchus mykiss; salmonid; cDNA microarray; stress response; intermediary metabolism


   INTRODUCTION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
CORTISOL, THE PRINCIPAL GLUCOCORTICOID in teleosts, is secreted by the interrenal tissues (analogous to the adrenal cortex) dispersed in the head kidney region. This steroid is involved in a diverse array of functions, including growth and metabolism, osmoregulation, immune function, and reproduction (31, 63). A well-studied role for cortisol involves tissue-specific metabolic reprogramming to cope with the increased energy demands associated with stress, but the associated molecular responses are far from clear. It is well established that cortisol actions are mediated via the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) belonging to the nuclear receptor family of ligand-bound transcription factors (46, 59).

From a comparative standpoint, unlike mammals, teleosts appear to have multiple isoforms of GR (7, 18, 46), although the physiological role for each isoform is unknown. Also, some of the cortisol effects may be mediated via mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) activation; recently, an MR-specific ligand was identified in trout (46, 56). In addition to genomic signaling mediated by GR and MR, recent studies also point to a nongenomic signaling by corticosteroids involving either membrane receptor activation and/or changes in membrane structure associated with this steroid incorporation (6, 57). Although teleostean GRs have been cloned and sequenced and their transcriptional regulation characterized using bacterial reporter constructs (56), very little is known about the molecular responses to GR activation in a physiologically relevant model system.

Primary culture of hepatocytes has been routinely used as a model system of choice for characterization of hormone signaling and associated metabolic response in teleosts (32, 34, 52). Indeed, with the use of this cell system, studies have established that, as in mammals, cortisol is a gluconeogenic hormone in fish (5, 31, 50, 60). The increased liver capacity for gluconeogenesis is an important stress adaptation, as glucose is the primary fuel to cope with the energy-demanding pathways essential for regaining homeostasis (31). Although studies have focused on changes in tissue metabolic capacity with cortisol treatment, few studies have actually addressed the molecular mechanisms during stress adaptation that are GR specific in fish (31, 59). To this end, RU486 (a steroid analog) has been a useful tool to elucidate GR-specific responses in piscine models (7, 15, 23, 51, 54, 61), including inhibition of cortisol-induced glucose release in trout hepatocytes (50).

The advent of microarray technology has certainly hastened the process of identifying multiple pathways affected by experimental manipulations (3, 17), including stressor-responsive gene expression patterns in piscine models (25, 26, 47, 65). However, little is known about the role of stress hormone cortisol signaling in this adaptive molecular response to stress. Consequently, in this study, we utilized a custom-made low-density rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) cDNA array, enriched with genes involved in the endocrine and metabolic responses to stress, to identify the GR-responsive gene expression pattern in trout hepatocytes. We resorted to using a low-density array, as opposed to recently developed high-density arrays, mainly because our focus was on genes that were well characterized in trout as playing a key role in the adaptive responses to regain homeostasis. The GR-specific responses were teased out by treating cells with cortisol and blocking the response with RU486 (50, 61, 62).


   MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Chemicals
Cortisol, RU486 (mifepristone), L-15 media, protease inhibitor cocktail, 2-phenoxyethanol, bicinchoninic acid (BCA) reagent, and antibiotic and antimycotic solution were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). Multiwell (6-well plate) tissue culture plates were obtained from Sarstedt. Electrophoresis reagents and molecular mass markers were from Bio-Rad (Hercules, CA). Primary antibody to trout GR was developed in our laboratory (50), and the secondary antibody, alkaline phosphatase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG, was purchased from Bio-Rad. Nitro blue tetrazolium (NBT) and 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate p-toluidine salt (BCIP) were obtained from Fisher Scientific (Nepean, ON, Canada).

Experimental Fish
Juvenile rainbow trout (120 ± 10 g body mass) were obtained from Humber Springs Trout Farm (Mono Mills, ON, Canada) and kept at the University of Waterloo Aquatic Facility at 10 ± 1°C on a 12:12-h light-dark cycle and fed once daily to satiety (5 point sinking feed; Martin Mills, Elmira, ON, Canada). The fish were acclimated for at least 5 wk before the experiments, and the animal protocol was approved by the animal care committee at the University of Waterloo.

Primary Culture of Trout Hepatocytes
An in situ liver perfusion method using collagenase was followed in isolating rainbow trout hepatocytes, as described in detail before (49). Briefly, isolated hepatocytes were washed with modified Hanks' medium (110 mM NaCl, 3 mM KCl, 1.25 mM K2HPO4, 5 mM NaHCO3, 0.6 mM MgSO4, 1 mM MgCl2, and 10 mM HEPES; pH 7.63 at room temperature) and then with modified Hanks' medium containing 1.5 mM CaCl2 and 2% defatted bovine serum albumin (BSA), pH 7.63. L-15 media supplemented with antibiotic and antimycotic agents were used to resuspend the washed hepatocytes. Trypan blue exclusion method was used to determine cell viability, and >95% of cells were viable. Cells were plated in six-well tissue culture plates at a density of 1.5 million cells/well (0.75 million cells/ml) in L-15 media and were maintained at 13°C for 24 h before commencement of the experiment. All the experiments were repeated with hepatocytes isolated from four different fish.

Experimental Treatments
The experimental protocol consisted of replacing the media with either fresh media (control; 0.01% ethanol used as vehicle) or media containing cortisol (100 ng/ml), RU486 (GR antagonist; 1,000 ng/ml), or a combination of both RU486 (1,000 ng/ml) and cortisol (100 ng/ml); cells were maintained at 13°C for 24 h before sampling. The exposure time was chosen based on our previous study (50), which showed maximal response to cortisol stimulation at 24 h in trout hepatocytes. In the combination group, cells were incubated with the drug 30 min before the addition of cortisol. The cortisol concentration used mimicked stressed levels seen in trout, while the RU486 concentration was shown previously to block cortisol-mediated metabolic effects in trout hepatocytes (50). Both cortisol and RU486 were dissolved in ethanol, and the final concentration of ethanol in the incubation medium was maintained at 0.01% in all treatments. At the end of the experimental period, the medium was collected, and the cells were centrifuged (13,000 g for 1 min); supernatants were removed, and the cell pellets were flash frozen in dry ice and stored at –70°C. Media glucose was determined colorimetrically using a commercially available kit (Trinder method; Sigma). The cell viability was determined by measuring the release of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) into the medium. The LDH activity was determined following standard protocols (4). LDH leakage was minimal (<5% of total LDH) in all groups, and there were no significant difference among treatments (data not shown).

SDS-PAGE and Western Blotting
Sample protein concentrations were determined using the BCA method with BSA as the standard. The procedures followed for SDS-PAGE and Western blotting were according to established protocols (4). Briefly, samples (40 µg of protein) were separated on 8% polyacrylamide gels using the discontinuous buffer system of Laemmli (27). The proteins were transferred onto nitrocellulose membrane (20 V for 30 min) with a semidry transfer unit (Bio-Rad) using transfer buffer [25 mM Tris, pH 8.3, 192 mM glycine, and 20% (vol/vol) methanol]. Equal loading was confirmed by staining the membrane with Ponceau S. The membranes were washed and blocked with 5% skimmed milk in TBS-t [20 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 300 mM NaCl, and 0.1% (vol/vol) Tween 20 with 0.02% sodium azide] for 60 min. Polyclonal anti-trout GR antibody was used at a 1:1,000 dilution, and the secondary antibody was alkaline phosphatase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:3,000 dilution). The membranes were incubated in primary antibody for 60 min at room temperature, washed with TBS-t (2 x 5 min), incubated with secondary antibody for 60 min, washed with TBS-t (2 x 5 min), and finally washed with TBS (1 x 15 min). Band detection was carried out with NBT (0.033% wt/vol) and BCIP (0.017% wt/vol), and the bands were quantified with Chemi-imager using AlphaEase software (Alpha Innotech). The molecular mass of the protein was confirmed using prestained low-range molecular mass markers (phosphorylase B, 112 kDa; BSA, 81 kDa; ovalbumin, 49.9 kDa; carbonic anhydrase, 36.2 kDa; soybean trypsin inhibitor, 29.9 kDa; lysozyme, 21.3 kDa).

cDNA Microarray
Microarray experiments were designed to comply with minimum information about microarray experiment (MIAME) guidelines. The development and application of the targeted trout cDNA microarray have been described in detail before (65). The microarray platform has been submitted to the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO; accession no. GPL 3713). A common reference standard (RS) was made by pooling equal amounts of RNA from untreated hepatocytes. Each and every sample was cohybridized with the RS, and a total of 16 hybridizations (4 treatments x 4 independent fish hepatocytes) were performed. Dye swapping was carried out so that each treatment had two samples labeled with either cyanine-3 (Cy3) or Cy5.

RNA Isolation, cDNA Synthesis, and Labeling
Total RNA was extracted from the hepatocytes using the RNeasy extraction kit (Qiagen). The quality of the total RNA obtained was checked by gel electrophoresis on a 1% agarose gel containing ethidium bromide, and the concentration was determined spectrophotometrically at 260/280 nm using a Cary 50 UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Varian).

Thirty micrograms of intact total RNA (either treatment sample or RS RNA) were indirectly labeled with Cy5 and Cy3 following The Institute for Genomic Research (TIGR) protocol (http://www.tigr.org/tdb/microarray/protocolsTIGR.shtml) (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ). In brief, cDNA was synthesized by incorporating aminoallyl dUTP (AA-dUTP) at 42°C for 3 h. RNA was hydrolyzed with 10 µl of 1 M NaOH and 10 µl of 0.5 M EDTA for 15 min at 70°C and neutralized by adding 10 µl of 1 M HCl. To remove unincorporated AA-dUTP and free amines, the reactions were purified with Qiagen columns using phosphate wash buffer and phosphate elution buffer. The purified sample was dried in a Speed Vac, and AA-cDNA was resuspended in 0.1 M sodium bicarbonate buffer; coupling to the cyanine dye ester was performed for 90 min in the dark at room temperature. The removal of uncoupled dye was performed using the Qiagen PCR purification kit.

Hybridization and Postprocessing
Before hybridization, the Cy3- and Cy5-labeled samples were combined and dried in a Speed Vac. To the dried sample, 26 µl of hybridization buffer and 2 µl each of calf thymus DNA (10 mg/ml) and yeast tRNA (10 mg/ml) were added. The samples were denatured for 2 min at 95°C, snap cooled on ice for 1 min, and centrifuged for 1 min at maximum speed. The solution was pipetted onto a microarray slide placed in a hybridization chamber, and the coverslip was placed carefully. Hybridization was carried out overnight in a water bath at 37°C.

After hybridization, the coverslip was removed by immersion in a low-stringency wash buffer (1x SSC, 0.2% SDS). The slide was washed for 10 min in low-stringency wash buffer, 5 min in high-stringency wash buffer (0.1x SSC, 0.2% SDS, and MilliQ water), and twice for 2.5 min in 0.1x SSC. Low-stringency washing was carried out at 48°C, whereas the remaining washing steps were at room temperature with shaking. Finally, the slides were quickly dipped in MilliQ water and centrifuged at 1,000 g for 2 min in a 50-ml Falcon tube at room temperature for drying.

Image Analysis
Image analysis was carried out using VersArray ChipReader software version 3.1 (Bio-Rad). For each microarray slide, two images were produced by illuminating the array at 635 nm (excitation of Cy5) and 532 nm (Cy3). For both illuminations, photomultiplier tube (gain and light amplification) settings were at 900, and laser power was set at 90%. All images were captured in a TIFF format.

Spot finding and quantification were carried out with ImaGene 3.0 microarray image analysis software (BioDiscovery, Los Angeles, CA). Briefly, a grid was created, taking into account the number of spots, the printing pattern, and the size of the spots. Spot finding was performed using a semiautomatic method in which each spot was checked for proper alignment within the grid manually. Finally, spot quantification was performed to obtain the expression level of each gene on the array.

Data Analysis
The data analysis was carried out using the microarray data analysis system (MIDAS) (48). Poor or negative control spots were flagged as unreliable and were excluded from the analysis. For each spot, signal/noise (SN) threshold was calculated using the following formula: [I(A or B) + Bkg(A or B)]/Bkg(A or B), where, respectively, I(A) and I(B) denote background-corrected signal intensity for channels A and B and Bkg(A) and Bkg(B) denote background intensity for channels A and B. The SN ratio for each channel was compared with the set threshold value of 2.0, and any spots ≤2.0 were marked as bad and excluded from downstream analysis. Data were then LOWESS normalized before calculation of the gene expression ratios. Data for each treatment (fold change relative to the RS) were calculated as a ratio of normalized gene intensity for the sample to that of the reference RNA on each slide. The raw data set has been deposited into GEO (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo; series GSE 7671).

Of the genes that were significantly different among the treatments, six were picked for gene quantification using quantitative real-time PCR (iCycler, Bio-Rad) to validate the reliability of gene expression patterns observed with the microarray.

Quantitative Real-Time PCR
cDNA synthesis.
The first-strand cDNA was synthesized from 1 µg of total RNA using the First-Strand cDNA synthesis kit (MBI Fermentas). Briefly, total RNA was heat denatured (70°C) and cooled on ice. The sample was used in a 20-µl reverse transcriptase (RT) reaction using 0.5 µg of oligo(dT) primers and 1 mM each dNTP, 20 U of ribonuclease inhibitors, and 40 U of Moloney murine leukemia virus RT. The reaction was incubated at 37°C for 1 h and stopped by heating at 70°C for 10 min.

Relative standard curve.
A relative standard curve for all of the genes was constructed using serial dilutions of plasmid vector stock with inserted target sequences according to established protocols (50). The primers were designed using rainbow trout sequences, and the details of the gene accession numbers, primer sequences, melting temperatures, and sizes of the amplified products are given in Table 1. The Platinum Quantitative PCR SuperMix-uracil DNA glycosylase (UDG) (Invitrogen) used was 2x concentrated, and every 25-µl reaction had 1.5 U of Platinum Taq DNA polymerase, 20 mM Tris·HCl (pH 8.4), 50 mM KCl, 3 mM MgCl2, 200 µM dGTP, 200 µM dATP, 200 µM dCTP, 400 µM dUTP, and 1 U of UDG; the reaction also contained 0.2 µM forward and reverse primers, fluorescein calibration dye (1:2,000; Bio-Rad), and SYBR Green I nucleic acid gel stain (1:100,000; Roche). Master mixes, to reduce pipetting errors, were prepared at every stage for triplicate reactions (3 x 25 µl) for each standard.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 1. Oligonucleotide primers used in quantitative real-time PCR and their melting temperatures

 
Quantification.
One microliter of cDNA sample was used as a template for every 25-µl reaction of target genes, and 0.5 µl of cDNA was used as a template for ß-actin. Each sample was set up in triplicate for quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR). The reaction components were exactly the same as described above, and, for every single test sample, a qPCR for both the target and the housekeeping gene (ß-actin) was performed. The following PCR cycle was used for gene amplification: 95°C, 3 min, and 40 cycles of denaturing at 95°C, 30 s; annealing (Table 1), 30 s; and extension, 72°C, 30 s, followed by a 4°C hold at the end of the PCR reaction. The transcript abundance for each gene was calculated from the threshold cycles (CT), using their respective standard curves, followed by normalization with ß-actin exactly as described before (50). The transcript abundance of ß-actin was unchanged with different treatments and therefore used in the normalization.

Statistical Analysis
Data are shown as means ± SE. One-way ANOVA was used to compare the effect of different treatments on media glucose production, GR protein content, and transcriptional responses observed with either microarray or qPCR. All data were transformed for homogeneity of variance, but nontransformed values are shown. A post hoc (Bonferroni test) test was used for pairwise comparison whenever differences were observed. A probability level of P < 0.05 was considered significant. Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS version 12.0.1 (SPSS, Chicago, IL).


   RESULTS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Glucose Release
Cortisol treatment increased glucose production (~50%) compared with the control group, whereas RU486 inhibited this cortisol-induced glucose production in trout hepatocytes (Fig. 1). RU486 alone had no effect on glucose production compared with the control group.


Figure 1
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 1. Glucocorticoid receptor-mediated glucose production in primary culture of trout hepatocytes. Hepatocytes were exposed to either control (vehicle; 0.01% ethanol), cortisol (100 ng/ml), RU486 (1,000 ng/ml), or combination of RU486 + cortisol. In the combination group, RU486 was added to the hepatocytes 30 min before cortisol addition. Media and hepatocytes were sampled 24 h after treatment, and media glucose release was measured using Trinder method. All values represent means ± SE; n = 4 independent fish. Bars with different letters are significantly different (1-way ANOVA; P < 0.05).

 
GR Protein and mRNA Abundance
GR protein expression was lower in all of the treatment groups compared with the control group (Fig. 2, A and B). No difference in GR protein content was observed between RU486- and cortisol-exposed groups, whereas in the combination group, GR protein content was lower compared with cortisol-treated but not RU486-treated groups (Fig. 2B). Cortisol treatment elevated GR mRNA abundance compared with the control group (Fig. 2C). This cortisol-mediated GR transcript response was abolished by RU486 (combination group). An increase in GR mRNA abundance was also observed with RU486 alone compared with the control group (Fig. 2C).


Figure 2
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 2. Effect of cortisol and RU486 on glucocorticoid receptor (GR) protein (A and B) and mRNA content (C) in trout hepatocytes. A: representative Western blot showing GR protein in trout hepatocytes, immunodetected using monoclonal rabbit anti-trout antibody. Duplicate samples are loaded in adjacent lanes for each treatment. B: densitometric band intensities were quantified and expressed as arbitrary units. C: GR mRNA content was determined by quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) and expressed as %control. Hepatocytes were exposed to either control (vehicle; 0.01% ethanol), cortisol (100 ng/ml), RU486 (1,000 ng/ml), or a combination of RU486 + cortisol. In the combination group, RU486 was added to the hepatocytes 30 min before cortisol addition. All values represent means ± SE; n = 4 independent fish. Bars with different letters are significantly different (1-way ANOVA; P < 0.05).

 
Gene Expression
Microarray.
On the basis of the statistical significance level of P < 0.05, a total of 23 genes were affected by the various treatments compared with the control group. Of the 23 genes, 18 genes are altered by cortisol treatment alone compared with control and are considered GR dependent, as combination treatment (cortisol + RU486) inhibited this cortisol-induced transcriptional response (Tables 2 and 3). Among them, phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (PEPCK), glutamine synthetase-1 (GS-1), GS-2, GS-4, arginase, glutamate decarboxylase (GAD65), cysteine-rich protein, heat shock protein-90 (hsp90), cytochrome P-450 2K5 (CYP2K5), GR, and cathepsin D transcript levels were elevated by cortisol (Table 2), whereas thyroid hormone receptor-{alpha}, cytochrome P-450 2M1 (P4502M1), metallothionein, fibroblast growth factor (FGF), lipoprotein receptor, aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR), and vitelline envelope protein-ß (VEP-ß) transcripts were reduced by cortisol treatment (Table 3).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 2. List of genes that are upregulated with cortisol treatment and are GR dependent

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 3. List of genes that are downregulated with cortisol treatment and are GR dependent

 
Treatment with RU486 alone elevated GR, cytochrome P4501A3 (CYP1A3), fushitarazu factor-1 (tFGR-1), and insulin receptor-c transcript levels (Tables 2 and 4), whereas cathepsin D, AhR, and VEP-ß transcripts were reduced compared with the control group (Tables 3 and 4). In the combination group (cortisol + RU486), transcript levels of glucokinase were higher, whereas total estrogen receptor (ER{alpha} and ERß) was lower compared with the control group (Table 4).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 4. List of differentially expressed genes that are affected by RU486 alone and in combination with cortisol

 
qPCR.
We validated the reliability of microarray results by quantifying the transcript abundance of select genes using qPCR. Six genes that showed differences with microarray were chosen, and they were GR, PEPCK, ER, cathepsin D, GS-1, and hsp90. Transcript abundance of all the genes measured showed similar profiles with both qPCR and microarray (Fig. 3). As seen with the array, cortisol significantly increased PEPCK, cathepsin D, GS-1, and hsp90 mRNA abundance compared with all other groups, whereas RU486 inhibited this cortisol-mediated transcriptional response in rainbow trout liver. RU486 treatment alone showed an increase in cathepsin D transcript levels compared with the control group, and this was also seen with the microarray (Fig. 3D). Total ER mRNA abundance was reduced in all treatment groups compared with the control group and was similar to that seen with the array (Fig. 3E).


Figure 3
View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 3. qPCR results of the randomly chosen genes [phosphoenolpyruvate carboxy kinase (PEPCK), cathepsin D, glutamine synthetase-1, heat shock protein-90 (hsp90), and estrogen receptor] to test the validity of microarray results. Microarray results (log2 ratios) are expressed as %control and shown along with qPCR results for comparison. All values represent means ± SE; n = 4 independent fish. Bars with different letters are significantly different (1-way ANOVA; P < 0.05).

 

   DISCUSSION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Our results demonstrate for the first time that several genes encoding proteins critical for metabolic adjustments to cope with stressor insults are glucocorticoid responsive in rainbow trout. This finding underscores a mechanistic link between stressor-induced elevations in plasma cortisol concentration and the adaptive liver molecular programming evident during stress recovery in fish (65).

GR Regulation
While RU486 has been used as a tool to elucidate GR-specific signaling in fish (15, 23, 51, 54), the mode of action of this drug was thought to involve specific binding to GR and inhibition of cortisol signaling (41). Our results suggest GR degradation as an additional novel mechanism for GR silencing by RU486 in fish. As seen before, cortisol also reduced GR protein content in trout hepatocytes, and the proteasome is involved in this ligand-mediated GR protein degradation (5, 50). However, the greater reduction in GR protein with cortisol in the presence of RU486 leads us to propose that an additional pathway(s) may also be involved in RU486-mediated GR degradation.

Cortisol-mediated GR degradation was also shown to stimulate GR mRNA accumulation in trout hepatocytes, leading to the proposal of a negative feedback regulation of GR protein content (50). A similar response to cortisol treatment was also seen in this study, supporting the concept of GR autoregulation in trout hepatocytes (50). We hypothesized that this enhanced GR turnover may be a mechanism for maintaining tissue responsiveness to cortisol stimulation (50, 60). Interestingly, despite a pronounced decrease in GR protein content with RU486, the mRNA response was only minimal, suggesting that inhibition of cortisol signaling by this drug may also involve altered GR turnover in trout hepatocytes. Indeed, disruption of the cortisol-mediated mismatch between GR mRNA and protein content by RU486 (in the combination group) abolished this steroid-induced glucose release. Taken together, these results implicate a key role for cortisol-mediated GR autoregulation in maintaining the target tissue responsiveness to cortisol stimulation in trout hepatocytes.

Metabolic Adjustments
A major target tissue response to elevated plasma cortisol levels involves modulation of metabolic pathways in fish (31). The hallmark of stress is disturbance to homeostasis, resulting in upregulation of energy-demanding pathways, including protein synthesis, to restore internal fluid balance (63). Indeed, this is reflected in a higher metabolic demand in stressed animals, including fish (63). Although the role of cortisol in regulating energy-demanding pathways is not clearly known, studies have shown an enhancement of liver gluconeogenic capacity leading to elevated glucose production in fish (4, 31, 50). Indeed, this metabolic response is a key aspect of the stress recovery process, as glucose is the preferred fuel, especially for tissues such as gills and brain, to meet the increased energy demand (33). This glucose response with cortisol stimulation corresponded to an upregulation of PEPCK transcript levels, supporting enhanced gluconeogenic capacity (31). The inhibition of this glucose elevation and PEPCK mRNA abundance by RU486 (Figs. 1 and 3A) clearly underscores the significance of genomic cortisol signaling in the glucose response, critical for metabolic adjustments to stressor exposure in fish (65).

The C3 precursor for gluconeogenesis is thought to come from amino acids from peripheral sources including muscle proteolysis (31). However, the upregulation of liver transcripts for genes involved in protein metabolism (GS and arginase), including catabolism (cathepsin D and GAD65), supports a key role for genomic cortisol signaling in the molecular programming of liver protein metabolism. The higher transcript abundance of cathepsin D by cortisol clearly leads us to propose that this steroid increases protein breakdown capacity in the liver. Although the role of cathepsin D in fish muscle proteolysis has been studied to a limited extent (30, 36), little is known about its role in liver protein degradation. Indeed, a corticosteroid response element has been identified in the mammalian cathepsin D promoter sequence and agrees well with the modulation of this gene by dexamethasone in muscle (11). Although the cathepsin D promoter has not been characterized in a piscine model, we hypothesize that genomic cortisol signaling leads to increased proteolytic capacity in fish liver in response to stressor exposure. These susceptible hepatic proteins may serve as transient sources of amino acids for hepatic oxidation as well as gluconeogenesis to fuel extrahepatic tissues during stress recovery (31). The upregulation of liver PEPCK (a key gluconeogenic enzyme) and GAD65 (glutamate metabolism) by cortisol in the present study supports the above contention.

A novel finding from this study is the suppression of lipoprotein receptor (LPR) mRNA content by cortisol in fish. LPRs are a highly conserved group of proteins thought to be involved in the uptake and metabolism of lipoproteins. For instance, vitellogenin receptor belongs to the LPR family, and uptake of vitellogenin (Vtg) into oocytes occurs through cell surface LPR in both invertebrates and vertebrates, including fishes (43). Little is known about LPR activation in fish, but the well-established role of stress and/or cortisol treatment in enhancing lipid metabolism in the liver (31) leads us to propose that LPR regulation by cortisol is part of the metabolic adjustments during stress in fish. Indeed, glucocorticoids are known to influence these receptors in mammals (55). Taken together, the recent observation that some of these glucocorticoid-responsive transcripts (Tables 2 and 3) were also transiently affected during recovery from an acute handling stressor supports a key role for genomic cortisol signaling in the liver metabolic reprogramming critical for stress adaptation (65).

Cellular Stress Response
In addition to its role in energy repartitioning associated with stress, our results also highlight a role for GR signaling in modulating the cellular stress response. Specifically, we show for the first time that the cellular chaperone hsp90, but not hsp70, is modulated by GR signaling in fish. Although previous studies did suggest a role for cortisol in regulating hsp90 expression in fish (12, 49, 59, 60), the mode of action was not ascertained. The close association of hsp90 with GR and the role of this chaperone in maintaining GR stability and signaling are well established in mammalian models (44, 45). Recently, we also confirmed that hsp90 is critical for GR stability in trout hepatocytes (50). The GR-specific hsp90 response observed here, coupled with our earlier report that the inhibition of hsp90 binding to GR enhances this steroid receptor protein degradation (50), implicates a key role for cortisol in modulating this chaperone. We hypothesize that the enhanced tissue responsiveness to cortisol stimulation during stress involves upregulation of hsp90 expression in fish.

Modulation of Estrogen-Responsive Genes
Elevated plasma cortisol levels were shown to have a negative impact on reproduction, including reduced plasma Vtg, gonadal steroids, and gonadotropin levels in fish (8, 9, 42). Vtg synthesis occurs in liver in response to ER activation by estradiol-17ß in fish (16). Cortisol was shown to inhibit hepatic ER and Vtg expression, leading to impaired vitellogenesis in salmonids (28). Although cortisol inhibited hepatic ER but not Vtg mRNA abundance in the present study, it is unclear whether this was GR specific, as RU486 also reduced ER transcript levels in trout. This agrees with results from another trout study demonstrating that RU486 did not inhibit the cortisol-mediated downregulation of ER (28). Indeed, vitelline envelope protein (a constituent of extracellular envelope around the growing oocyte) transcript levels, which are regulated by ER signaling (53), were also downregulated by cortisol and RU486. While these results clearly suggest a role for cortisol in modulating estrogen-responsive gene expression, our results highlight for the first time that RU486 may also interfere with the estrogen signaling pathway. Overall, stress-induced impairment of reproductive processes may involve multiple pathways, including cortisol-mediated suppression of transcripts encoding key proteins (ER and VEP) involved in reproduction.

Xenobiotic-Responsive Genes
In addition to the role of glucocorticoids in energy catabolism, this steroid also modulates the expression of several proteins important in the cellular defense against pollutants. For instance, metallothionein (MT), a key protein involved in sequestering metals that also has antioxidant properties, is synthesized in response to metal exposure and was shown to be regulated by glucocorticoids in vertebrates, including fishes (20, 37). The higher MT expression in response to glucocorticoids is mediated via binding of activated GR to glucocorticoid response elements on the promoter region of the MT gene and initiating transcription (20). Interestingly, our results show a reduction in MT transcript levels by cortisol in trout hepatocytes. Although the reason is unclear, one possibility for the difference may be the pharmacological level of cortisol used in the earlier study (20), whereas our study used a steroid concentration representative of a stressed fish.

Glucocorticoids also modulate the cytochrome P-450 (CYP) family of proteins, which are involved in the metabolism and clearance of endogenous steroids and xenobiotic compounds (35). Several isoforms of CYP genes are transcriptionally modulated by glucocorticoids in a GR-dependent manner, and the presence of glucocorticoid response elements in the promoter region of these genes is also established (40). For instance, dexamethasone (GR agonist) induced CYP3A4 and CYP2C9 mRNA expression in human hepatocyte culture by binding to glucocorticoid response elements in the promoter region, and this was inhibited by RU486 (39). Our results show for the first time that liver CYP2K5 and CYP2M1 transcripts are modulated by cortisol in trout hepatocytes. Both CYP2K5 and CYP2M1 are constitutively expressed in trout liver and important for xenobiotic metabolism (29). Although there is no previous evidence on the regulation of these two genes by steroids in fish, induction of CYP1A1, the most widely studied CYP enzyme in fish, by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) was potentiated by cortisol in a GR-dependent fashion (10). The CYP1A1 induction is mediated by the activation of AhR, a ligand-activated transcription factor belonging to the family of nuclear receptors, and transcript levels of this receptor were reduced by corticosteroids in a mammalian model (1). Our results support the reduction of AhR mRNA abundance by cortisol, although the specificity of the signaling pathway was unclear, as RU486 also suppressed the AhR transcript levels in trout. Because both AhR and GR, along with other steroid nuclear receptors, share a similar complement of accessory proteins for their signaling, it is likely that there is competition for the limited pool of accessory proteins on activation of any particular signaling pathway (44). Indeed, TCDD is shown to inhibit steroid receptor-mediated transcription in cell lines transfected with steroid-responsive elements (21). In addition, sex steroid hormones also inhibit TCDD-induced CYP1A enzyme activity via receptor-mediated pathways (21). While similar cross talk has not been established between AhR and GR, the negative relationship between AhR and GR mRNA abundance with TCDD suggests a link between these two receptors (2).

Conclusions
In conclusion, using a pharmacological approach together with targeted cDNA microarray, we identified several glucocorticoid-responsive genes in trout hepatocytes. The majority of these genes are involved in liver metabolic reprogramming, critical for coping with the enhanced energy demand in response to stressor exposure. This is further supported by results from our recent study showing that a majority of the genes that were impacted by cortisol were also stress responsive in trout (65). Also, our results highlight a key role for cortisol in modulating the adaptive responses to xenobiotic exposure and reproduction. Collectively, this study demonstrates for the first time a key role for genomic cortisol signaling, via GR, in the molecular reprogramming of liver function, which may be essential to cope with stress.


   GRANTS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
REFERENCES
 
Support for this study was provided by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada discovery grant to M. M. Vijayan and an NSERC postdoctoral fellowship to N. Aluru.


   FOOTNOTES
 
Article published online before print. See web site for date of publication (http://physiolgenomics.physiology.org).

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: M. M. Vijayan, Dept. of Biology, Univ. of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1 Canada (e-mail: mvijayan{at}uwaterloo.ca).


   REFERENCES
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Abbott BD. Review of the interaction between TCDD and glucocorticoids in embryonic palate. Toxicology 105: 365–373, 1995.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  2. Abbott BD, Probst MR, Perdew GH, Buckalew AR. AH receptor, ARNT, glucocorticoid receptor, EGF receptor, EGF, TGF alpha, TGF beta 1, TGF beta 2, and TGF beta 3 expression in human embryonic palate, and effects of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD). Teratology 58: 30–43, 1998.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  3. Amundson SA, Bittner M, Meltzer P, Trent J, Fornace AJ Jr. Physiological function as regulation of large transcriptional programs: the cellular response to genotoxic stress. Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol 129: 703–710, 2001.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Boone AN, Ducouret B, Vijayan MM. Glucocorticoid-induced glucose release is abolished in trout hepatocytes with elevated hsp70 content. J Endocrinol 172: R1–R5, 2002.[Abstract]
  5. Boone AN, Vijayan MM. Glucocorticoid-mediated attenuation of the hsp70 response in trout hepatocytes involves the proteasome. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 283: R680–R687, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Borski RJ, Hyde GN, Fruchtman S. Signal transduction mechanisms mediating rapid, nongenomic effects of cortisol on prolactin release. Steroids 67: 539–548, 2002.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  7. Bury NR, Sturm A, Le Rouzic P, Lethimonier C, Ducouret B, Guiguen Y, Robinson-Rechavi M, Laudet V, Rafestin-Oblin ME, Prunet P. Evidence for two distinct functional glucocorticoid receptors in teleost fish. J Mol Endocrinol 31: 141–156, 2003.[Abstract]
  8. Campbell PM, Pottinger TG, Sumpter JP. Stress reduces the quality of gametes produced by rainbow trout. Biol Reprod 47: 1140–1150, 1992.[Abstract]
  9. Carragher JF, Sumpter JP, Pottinger TG, Pickering AD. The deleterious effects of cortisol implantation on reproductive function in two species of trout, Salmo trutta L. and Salmo gairdneri Richardson. Gen Comp Endocrinol 76: 310–321, 1989.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  10. Celander M, Weisbrod R, Stegeman JJ. Glucocorticoid potentiation of cytochrome P4501A1 induction by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in porcine and human endothelial cells in culture. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 232: 749–753, 1997.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  11. Dardevet D, Sornet C, Taillandier D, Savary I, Attaix D, Grizard J. Sensitivity and protein turnover response to glucocorticoids are different in skeletal muscle from adult and old rats. Lack of regulation of the ubiquitin-proteasome proteolytic pathway in aging. J Clin Invest 96: 2113–2119, 1995.[Web of Science][Medline]
  12. Deane EE, Woo NY. Ontogeny of thyroid hormones, cortisol, hsp70 and hsp90 during silver sea bream larval development. Life Sci 72: 805–818, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  13. Erdo SL, Wolff JR. gamma-Aminobutyric acid outside the mammalian brain. J Neurochem 54: 363–372, 1990.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  14. Erlitzki R, Gong Y, Zhang M, Minuk G. Identification of gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit types in human and rat liver. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 279: G733–G739, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Eros SK, Milligan CL. The effect of cortisol on recovery from exhaustive exercise in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss): potential mechanisms of action. Physiol Zool 69: 1196–1214, 1996.
  16. Flouriot G, Pakdel F, Valotaire Y. Transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulation of rainbow trout estrogen receptor and vitellogenin gene expression. Mol Cell Endocrinol 124: 173–183, 1996.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  17. Gracey AY. Interpreting physiological responses to environmental change through gene expression profiling. J Exp Biol 210: 1584–1592, 2007.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Greenwood AK, Butler PC, White RB, DeMarco U, Pearce D, Fernald RD. Multiple corticosteroid receptors in a teleost fish: distinct sequences, expression patterns, and transcriptional activities. Endocrinology 144: 4226–4236, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  19. Hoglund E, Kolm N, Winberg S. Stress-induced changes in brain serotonergic activity, plasma cortisol and aggressive behavior in Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus) is counteracted by L-DOPA. Physiol Behav 74: 381–389, 2001.[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Jacob ST, Ghoshal K, Sheridan JF. Induction of metallothionein by stress and its molecular mechanisms. Gene Expr 7: 301–310, 1999.[Web of Science][Medline]
  21. Jana NR, Sarkar S, Ishizuka M, Yonemoto J, Tohyama C, Sone H. Comparative effects of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin on MCF-7, RL95-2, and LNCaP cells: role of target steroid hormones in cellular responsiveness to CYP1A1 induction. Mol Cell Biol Res Commun 4: 174–180, 2000.[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Johnston GAR. GABA receptors. In: The Role of Peptides and Amino Acids as Neurotransmitters. New York: Liss, p. 1–17, 1981.
  23. Kelly SP, Wood CM. Cultured gill epithelia from freshwater tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus): effect of cortisol and homologous serum supplements from stressed and unstressed fish. J Membr Biol 190: 29–42, 2002.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  24. Kinoshita A, Wanibuchi H, Morimura K, Wei M, Shen J, Imaoka S, Funae Y, Fukushima S. Phenobarbital at low dose exerts hormesis in rat hepatocarcinogenesis by reducing oxidative DNA damage, altering cell proliferation, apoptosis and gene expression. Carcinogenesis 24: 1389–1399, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Krasnov A, Koskinen H, Rexroad C, Afanasyev S, Molsa H, Oikari A. Transcriptome responses to carbon tetrachloride and pyrene in the kidney and liver of juvenile rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Aquat Toxicol (Amst) 74: 70–81, 2005.[CrossRef]
  26. Krasnov A, Koskinen H, Pehkonen P, Rexroad CE 3rd, Afanasyev S, Molsa H. Gene expression in the brain and kidney of rainbow trout in response to handling stress. BMC Genomics 6: 3, 2005.[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Laemmli UK. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227: 680–685, 1970.[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Lethimonier C, Flouriot G, Valotaire Y, Kah O, Ducouret B. Transcriptional interference between glucocorticoid receptor and estradiol receptor mediates the inhibitory effect of cortisol on fish vitellogenesis. Biol Reprod 62: 1763–1771, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Miranda CL, Henderson MC, Williams DE, Buhler DR. In vitro metabolism of 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene by rainbow trout liver microsomes and trout P450 isoforms. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 142: 123–132, 1997.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  30. Mommsen TP. Salmon spawning migration and muscle protein metabolism: the August Krogh principle at work. Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol 139: 383–400, 2004.[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Mommsen TP, Vijayan MM, Moon TW. Cortisol in teleosts: dynamics, mechanisms of action, and metabolic regulation. Rev Fish Biol Fish 9: 211–268, 1999.[CrossRef]
  32. Moon TW. Hormones and fish hepatocyte metabolism: "the good, the bad and the ugly!". Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol 139: 335–345, 2004.[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Moon TW, Foster GD. Tissue carbohydrate metabolism, gluconeogenesis and hormonal and environmental influences. In: Biochemistry and Molecular Biology of Fishes, edited by Hochachka PW and Mommsen TP. Amsterdam: Elsevier, p. 65–99, 1999.
  34. Moon TW, Walsh PJ, Mommsen TP. Fish hepatocytes–a model metabolic system. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 42: 1772–1782, 1985.
  35. Munck A, Guyre PM, Holbrook NJ. Physiological functions of glucocorticoids in stress and their relation to pharmacological actions. Endocr Rev 5: 25–44, 1984.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Nielsen LB, Nielsen HH. Purification and characterization of cathepsin D from herring muscle (Clupea harengus). Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol 128: 351–363, 2001.[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Olsson PE, Hyllner SJ, Zafarullah M, Andersson T, Gedamu L. Differences in metallothionein gene expression in primary cultures of rainbow trout hepatocytes and the RTH-149 cell line. Biochim Biophys Acta 1049: 78–82, 1990.[Medline]
  38. Overli O, Pottinger TG, Carrick TR, Overli E, Winberg S. Brain monoaminergic activity in rainbow trout selected for high and low stress responsiveness. Brain Behav Evol 57: 214–224, 2001.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  39. Pascussi JM, Drocourt L, Gerbal-Chaloin S, Fabre JM, Maurel P, Vilarem MJ. Dual effect of dexamethasone on CYP3A4 gene expression in human hepatocytes. Sequential role of glucocorticoid receptor and pregnane X receptor. Eur J Biochem 268: 6346–6358, 2001.[Web of Science][Medline]
  40. Pascussi JM, Gerbal-Chaloin S, Drocourt L, Maurel P, Vilarem MJ. The expression of CYP2B6, CYP2C9 and CYP3A4 genes: a tangle of networks of nuclear and steroid receptors. Biochim Biophys Acta 1619: 243–253, 2003.[Medline]
  41. Pottinger TG. The effect of stress and exogenous cortisol on receptor-like binding of cortisol in the liver of rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss. Gen Comp Endocrinol 78: 194–203, 1990.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  42. Pottinger TG, Pickering AD. The effect of cortisol administration on hepatic and plasma estradiol-binding capacity in immature female rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss. Gen Comp Endocrinol 80: 264–273, 1990.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  43. Prat F, Coward K, Sumpter JP, Tyler CR. Molecular characterization and expression of two ovarian lipoprotein receptors in the rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss. Biol Reprod 58: 1146–1153, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Pratt WB, Galigniana MD, Morishima Y, Murphy PJ. Role of molecular chaperones in steroid receptor action. Essays Biochem 40: 41–58, 2004.[Web of Science][Medline]
  45. Pratt WB, Morishima Y, Murphy M, Harrell M. Chaperoning of glucocorticoid receptors. Handb Exp Pharmacol 172: 111–138, 2006.[Medline]
  46. Prunet P, Sturm A, Milla S. Multiple corticosteroid receptors in fish: from old ideas to new concepts. Gen Comp Endocrinol 147: 17–23, 2006.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  47. Rise ML, Douglas SE, Sakhrani D, Williams J, Ewart KV, Rise M, Davidson WS, Koop BF, Devlin RH. Multiple microarray platforms utilized for hepatic gene expression profiling of GH transgenic coho salmon with and without ration restriction. J Mol Endocrinol 37: 259–282, 2006.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Saeed AI, Sharov V, White J, Li J, Liang W, Bhagabati N, Braisted J, Klapa M, Currier T, Thiagarajan M, Sturn A, Snuffin M, Rezantsev A, Popov D, Ryltsov Kostukovich E A, Borisovsky I, Liu Z, Vinsavich A, Trush V, Quackenbus J. TM4: a free, open-source system for microarray data management and analysis. Biotechniques 34: 374–378, 2003.[Web of Science][Medline]
  49. Sathiyaa R, Campbell T, Vijayan MM. Cortisol modulates HSP90 mRNA expression in primary cultures of trout hepatocytes. Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol 129: 679–685, 2001.[CrossRef][Medline]
  50. Sathiyaa R, Vijayan MM. Autoregulation of glucocorticoid receptor by cortisol in rainbow trout hepatocytes. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 284: C1508–C1515, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Scott GR, Keir KR, Schulte PM. Effects of spironolactone and RU486 on gene expression and cell proliferation after freshwater transfer in the euryhaline killifish. J Comp Physiol [B] 175: 499–510, 2005.[CrossRef][Medline]
  52. Segner H. Isolation and primary culture of teleost hepatocytes. Comp Biochem Physiol A 120: 71–81, 1998.[CrossRef]
  53. Shimizu M, Fujita T, Hiramatsu N, Hara A. Immunochemical detection, estrogen induction and occurence in serum of vitelline envelope-related proteins of Sakhalin taimen Hucho perryi. Fish Sci 64: 600–605, 1998.
  54. Sloman KA, Desforges PR, Gilmour KM. Evidence for a mineralocorticoid-like receptor linked to branchial chloride cell proliferation in freshwater rainbow trout. J Exp Biol 204: 3953–3961, 2001.[Web of Science][Medline]
  55. Sporstol M, Mousavi SA, Eskild W, Roos N, Berg T. ABCA1, ABCG1 and SR-BI: hormonal regulation in primary rat hepatocytes and human cell lines. BMC Mol Biol 8: 5, 2007.[CrossRef][Medline]
  56. Sturm A, Bury N, Dengreville L, Fagart J, Flouriot G, Rafestin-Oblin ME, Prunet P. 11-Deoxycorticosterone is a potent agonist of the rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) mineralocorticoid receptor. Endocrinology 146: 47–55, 2005.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  57. Tasker JG, Di S, Malcher-Lopes R. Rapid glucocorticoid signaling via membrane-associated receptors. Endocrinology 147: 5549–5556, 2006.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  58. Trudeau VL. Neuroendocrine regulation of gonadotrophin II release and gonadal growth in the goldfish, Carassius auratus. Rev Reprod 2: 55–68, 1997.[Abstract]
  59. Vijayan MM, Prunet P, Boone AN. Xenobiotic impact on corticosteroid signaling. In: Biochemical and Molecular Biology of Fishes. Environmental Toxicology, edited by Moon TW and Mommsen TP. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2005, vol. 6, p. 365–394.[CrossRef]
  60. Vijayan MM, Raptis S, Sathiyaa R. Cortisol treatment affects glucocorticoid receptor and glucocorticoid-responsive genes in the liver of rainbow trout. Gen Comp Endocrinol 132: 256–263, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  61. Vijayan MM, Leatherland JF. In vivo effects of the steroid analogue RU486 on some aspects of intermediary and thyroid metabolism of brook charr, Salvelinus fontinalis. J Exp Zool 263: 265–271, 1992.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  62. Vijayan MM, Reddy PK, Leatherland JF, Moon TW. The effects of cortisol on hepatocyte metabolism in rainbow trout: a study using the steroid analogue RU486. Gen Comp Endocrinol 96: 75–84, 1994.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  63. Wendelaar Bonga SE. The stress response in fish. Physiol Rev 77: 591–625, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  64. Weyts FA, Verburg-van Kemenade BM, Flik G. Characterisation of glucocorticoid receptors in peripheral blood leukocytes of Carp, Cyprinus carpio L. Gen Comp Endocrinol 111: 1–8, 1998.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  65. Wiseman SB, Osachoff H, Bassett E, Malhotra J, Bruno J, VanAggelen G, Mommsen TP, Vijayan MM. Gene expression pattern in the liver during recovery from an acute stressor in rainbow trout. Comp Biochem Physiol D Genomics Proteomics. 146: 484–491, 2007.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
T. M. Rodela, M. D. McDonald, P. J. Walsh, and K. M. Gilmour
The regulatory role of glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid receptors in pulsatile urea excretion of the gulf toadfish, Opsanus beta
J. Exp. Biol., June 15, 2009; 212(12): 1849 - 1858.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
T. G. Evans and G. N. Somero
A microarray-based transcriptomic time-course of hyper- and hypo-osmotic stress signaling events in the euryhaline fish Gillichthys mirabilis: osmosensors to effectors
J. Exp. Biol., November 15, 2008; 211(22): 3636 - 3649.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
D. Alsop and M. M. Vijayan
Development of the corticosteroid stress axis and receptor expression in zebrafish
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, March 1, 2008; 294(3): R711 - R719.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
31/3/483    most recent
00118.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aluru, N.
Right arrow Articles by Vijayan, M. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Aluru, N.
Right arrow Articles by Vijayan, M. M.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the American Physiological Society.