Physiol. Genomics Watch the video to learn how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Physiol. Genomics 31: 183-192, 2007. First published May 29, 2007; doi:10.1152/physiolgenomics.00252.2006
1094-8341/07 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
31/2/183    most recent
00252.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lambrecht, N. W. G.
Right arrow Articles by Sachs, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lambrecht, N. W. G.
Right arrow Articles by Sachs, G.
Received 15 November 2006; accepted in final form 28 May 2007.
Physiological Genomics 31:183-192 (2007)
1094-8341/07 $8.00 © 2007 American Physiological Society

Fasting-induced changes in ECL cell gene expression

Nils W. G. Lambrecht1,2,4, Iskandar Yakubov2,4 and George Sachs2,3,4

1 Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
2 Department of Physiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
3 Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
4 Membrane Biology Laboratory, West Los Angeles Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Los Angeles, California


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Gastric enterochromaffin-like (ECL) cells release histamine in response to food because of elevation of gastrin and neural release of pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide (PACAP). Acid secretion is at a basal level in the absence of food but is rapidly stimulated with feeding. Rats fasted for 24 h showed a significant decrease of mucosal histamine despite steady-state expression of the histamine-synthesizing enzyme histamine decarboxylase (HDC). Comparative transcriptomal analysis using gene expression oligonucleotide microarrays of 95% pure ECL cells from fed and 24-h fasted rats, thereby eliminating mRNA contamination from other gastric mucosal cell types, identified significantly increased gene expression of the enzymes histidase and urocanase catabolizing the HDC substrate L-histidine but significantly decreased expression of the cellular L-histidine uptake transporter SN2 and of the vesicular monoamine transporter 2 (VMAT-2) responsible for histamine uptake into secretory vesicles. This was confirmed by reverse transcriptase-quantitative polymerase chain reaction of gastric fundic mucosal samples from fed and 24-h fasted rats. The decrease of VMAT-2 gene expression was also shown by a decrease in VMAT-2 protein content in protein extracts from fed and 24-h fasted rats compared with equal amounts of HDC protein and Na-K-ATPase {alpha}1-subunit protein content. These results indicate that rat gastric ECL cells regulate their histamine content during 24-h fasting not by a change in HDC gene or protein expression but by regulation of substrate concentration for HDC and a decreased histamine secretory pool.

enterochromaffin-like cell; oligonucleotide expression microarray; transcriptome; histamine; secretion


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
THE PARIETAL CELL of the mammalian stomach secretes acid in response to feeding to facilitate the digestion of food. This process is stimulated by histamine secreted by the enterochromaffin-like (ECL) cell located in the glands of the fundic region of the stomach. Normally, large stores of histamine are present in intracellular acidic secretory vesicles within the ECL cell. This ligand is then released with feeding in response to either gastrin release from the G cell or neural release of pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide (PACAP), thereby activating histamine-2 receptors located on the parietal cell (3, 5, 23). The vesicles also contain pancreastatin, a cleavage product of chromogranin A (18).

In the absence of the buffering effect of food, acid secreted by the parietal cell produces a highly acidic fluid that is potentially damaging to the upper gastrointestinal tract. Also, acid secretion is an energy-demanding process that is unnecessary without food. Therefore, it is expected that the quantity of histamine produced and released from ECL cells will decrease with fasting. Furthermore, this reduction in histamine production likely results in decreased storage of histamine in the ECL cell. This will reduce but not abolish acid secretion in the absence of food, since a basal rate of exocytosis of histamine occurs even in the absence of exogenous stimulation of the ECL cell (11).

Given the contrasting needs of the organism for gastric acid secretion with fasting and feeding, it is likely that the physiological state of the ECL cell and the enzymatic pathways involved in histamine production and release are changed to reduce histamine availability during fasting but maintain the ability of this cell to rapidly increase histamine production and secretion with feeding. A major factor in the ability of the ECL cell to regulate acid secretion should therefore be the histamine content of the secretory vesicles of the ECL cell. In addition to histamine regulation, many other ECL cell functions are likely to change with feeding or fasting for more precise regulation of acid production and regulation of the status of the ECL cell.

Potential mechanisms whereby steady-state histamine levels in fasting ECL cells could be altered include a decrease in histamine synthesis by downregulation of the rate-limiting enzyme histidine decarboxylase (HDC), by changes in translational or posttranslational processing of HDC affecting its activity, or by depletion of the substrate for this enzyme, L-histidine. The latter effect could be achieved by upregulation of a L-histidine-degrading pathway catalyzed by histidine ammonia lyase (histidase) and urocanate hydratase (urocanase) forming the 4-imidazolone 5-propionate intermediate that is then converted to L-glutamate or by downregulation of the L-histidine transporter in the ECL cell. Histamine stores could also be depleted by downregulation of vesicular monoamine transporter 2 (VMAT-2), the vesicular histamine transporter, resulting in decreased histamine accumulation in the secretory vesicles.

Gastrin is a major trophic factor for the ECL cell. Fasting has been shown to decrease plasma concentrations of gastrin in rodents (10, 20, 25) and in humans (14). Several groups have postulated that reduced gastrin levels lead to reduced HDC mRNA levels in ECL cells and hence reduction of histamine biosynthesis (6, 9, 10, 25). The possibility that histamine biosynthesis is attenuated by a decrease in the L-histidine content of ECL cells, thus depleting them of the substrate for HDC, has not yet been investigated. Moreover, ECL-specific levels of mRNA of HDC and other proteins involved in histamine synthesis and secretion or of other potential factors affecting ECL cell function during fasting have not been examined.

To determine the impact of fasting on factors modulating histamine production, transport, and secretion by the ECL cell and on the functional state of the cell, we obtained a highly enriched (>95%) population of ECL cells from stomachs of fasted and fed rats and measured ECL cell gene expression with whole rat genome expression microarrays and methods described previously (17). We identified changes in gene expression by this cell by comparing the transcriptome of purified ECL cell populations from normally fed and 24-h fasted rats to that of a mixed cell population of the whole fed or fasting gastric mucosa (subtractive hybridization). Expression of several key genes of histamine synthesis and secretion was then compared with that found in fed or fasting gastric mucosal homogenates, as measured by reverse transcriptase (RT)-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), confocal microscopy, and Western blotting. Microscopy of cell populations isolated from fasting and fed stomachs also allowed analysis of any change in the morphology of the ECL cell population.

The results of these studies show that there are significant changes in the expression of genes encoding proteins modulating the ability of the ECL cell to produce, accumulate, or secrete histamine in the absence of changes in mRNA and protein content of HDC. There are also significant changes in expression of other genes that result in changes in ECL cell neuroendocrine properties, inducing an apparently relatively quiescent state. These findings result in further insight into the mechanisms underlying peripheral regulation of gastric acid secretion during different physiological states and could provide targets for drugs that alter gastric acid secretion via their impact on the ECL cell.


    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Animals and experimental design.
Age- and weight-matched male Sprague-Dawley rats (250 g) were used for the experiments. Twenty rats were divided in two equal groups of 10. Group 1 continued to have ad libitum access to food and water for 24 h. Group 2 had free access to water but no access to food for 24 h. This procedure was repeated three times to provide three microarray transcriptome analyses from normal purified ECL cells (ECL) and three microarray transcriptome analyses from fasted purified ECL cells (ECLFas). An additional 11 rats were used to prepare 5 microarray analyses from mixed gastric mucosal cells (ST) obtained from animals with ad libitum access to food and water and 6 rats with free access to water but no access to food for 24 h, from which we prepared 6 microarray analyses from fasted mixed gastric mucosal cells (STFas). All animal protocols were reviewed and approved by the West Los Angeles Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

ECL cell purification from rat stomach to ~95% purity.
ECL cell suspensions purified to ~95% purity were prepared as described previously (17). Briefly, 10 stomachs were used to yield 120 ml of primary mucosal digested cell suspension in buffer A [in mM: 140 NaCl, 1.2 MgSO4, 1 CaCl2, 10 HEPES, and 11 glucose, with 0.5 g/l bovine serum albumin (BSA) and 300 mg/l DTT, pH 7.4]. The primary digest was subjected to Nycodenz gradient centrifugation before counterflow elutriation. Eight tubes of Nycodenz (Accudenz, Accurate Chemical & Scientific) gradients containing two layers of 14% and 7% Nycodenz (wt/vol) in buffer A were prepared and spun at 1,100 rpm for 8 min in a Sorvall centrifuge. Cells on top of the 14% layer were collected, washed twice, and resuspended in 8 ml of buffer A. This suspension was injected into a zonal rotor of an elutriator (Beckman) spinning at 1,500 rpm with a counterflow rate of 13 ml/min. Cell debris and small cells were washed out during an initial wash period of ~5 min. The speed of the centrifuge was then reduced to 1,200 rpm with a concurrent gradual increase of flow rate to 21 ml/min. Approximately 100–150 ml was collected containing small- to medium-size cells. Cells were washed twice and concentrated to a total volume of 2 ml in buffer A. Acridine orange (100 nM) was added to the ECL suspensions, and the cells were sorted with the UCLA Flow Cytometry Core and the FACStar PLUS service. The excitation wavelength was 488 nM; sorting was achieved by gating cells showing emission of both 532 and 585 nM.

Cells were sorted for 4 h, pooled in buffer A without DTT containing 10 U of RNase inhibitor (Promega), and pelleted by centrifugation in a Sorvall centrifuge for 5 min at 1,100 rpm. The majority of cells were resuspended in 100–200 µl of RNAlater (Qiagen) to inhibit RNase activity. A small portion of cells was used for immunohistochemical assessment using an polyclonal antibody against HDC (ALPCO) and a polyclonal antibody against VMAT-2 (ABR) and for typical morphological ECL cell features such as vesicles loaded with acridine orange in stacked (585-nm emission) and nonstacked (532-nm emission) form (8). Purity was at least 95% (17).

cRNA labeling and rat expression oligonucleotide microarray hybridization.
Each transcriptome analysis was performed with "subtractive hybridization" on 44K whole rat genome expression oligonucleotide microarrays (Agilent Technologies) as described previously (17).

To obtain total RNA from mixed gastric mucosal samples, rat stomachs of each group (fasted or fed ad libitum; see above) were freshly resected and opened, and the oxyntic mucosa was scraped off the stomach wall with the sharp edge of a slide. The fragments were filtered through a nylon sieve in 1.5 ml of RNALater (Qiagen) and homogenized on ice. One hundred microliters of this homogenate was used directly to isolate total gastric mucosal RNA with a NucleoSpin RNA II Kit (BD Biosciences). The same kit was also used to isolate total RNA from ~106 cells from the purified cell suspension (see above). The typical RNA concentration was 200–300 ng/µl. The RNA was assessed regarding purity and stability with a Bioanalyser 2100 (Agilent Technologies).

Fluorescently labeled cRNA was generated with a RT reaction with a poly d(T)-T7 promoter primer followed by T7 polymerase-based linear amplification in the presence of fluorophore-labeled nucleotides Cy3- or Cy5-CTP according to the manufacturer's protocol (Low RNA Input Fluor Linear Amp Kit, Agilent Technologies). The final cRNA concentration of typically 300–500 ng/µl and the Cy3- or Cy5-cytidine incorporation of 5–10 pmol/µg cRNA were determined with a Nanodrop spectrophotometer ND-1000 (Nanodrop Technologies). Labeled cRNA (3.5 µg) from whole gastric mucosal epithelium was combined with labeled cRNA from each purified cell suspension and hybridized to the 44K rat oligonucleotide expression array (Agilent Technologies) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Each set of three microarray experiments contained one dye swap experiment. All microarrays were scanned, and the intensities were normalized over background with a microarray scanner from Agilent Technologies including proprietary software. All microarray data sets (single channel) were imported into the microarray data analysis software Genespring 7.3 (Agilent Technologies), and normalized intensities were compared. The software is able to calculate the significance of difference between different sets of data [i.e., 3 sets of normal ECL cell preparations (ECL), 3 sets of ECL cells from fasted rats (ECLFas) compared with 5 sets of normal gastric mucosal homogenates (ST) and 6 sets of gastric mucosal homogenates from fasted animals (STFas)]. The microarray data were deposited for public access in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) NCBI database with the series number GSE6204 with 17 sample data submissions (GSM143172, GSM143311-15, GSM143319-23 GSM160703-04, GSM160729-33, and GSM160737).

RT-real-time qPCR.
Total RNA from gastric mucosal fundic homogenates from fed and 24-h fasted rats were generated as described above for the generation of control cRNA probes for the microarray experiments. One microgram of total RNA was added to the RT reaction using Omniscript (Qiagen) RT and an oligo(dT)12–18 primer (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Two microliters of RT product was then added to a real-time qPCR reaction together with the Dynamo SYBR Green qPCR Kit (Finnzymes) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Primers used were rat HDC: S-CTGTGGTTTGTGATTCGGTCCTTC, AS-GGATAGCCCATTGGTCAGGTCTTT; rat VMAT-2: S-CCAGCTCCTCACTAACCCATTCAT, AS-TCAGCAAGGTCGTTAGAGGTGTCC; rat Slc38a5 (SN2, SNAT5): S-ACCCTCACTGTGCCTGTTGTCCT, AS-CCAGGCAGAAGGGACTCAGGAA; rat urocanase: S-AACAGGTTGGCCCAGGAGAAGT, AS-GCAGAAGGCAGAACCGTCATAAAT; rat histidase: S-GTCTTAGAAGCCCACGGATTGAAA, AS-AGGGCTTTGGCTGGGTATTCAC; rat ZXDC zinc finger: S-GGTCGGATGAAGCACTGAACTCTG, AS-TGGGTGGTGTCTGAAGAAGTTGGT; rat Na-K-ATPase {alpha}1: S-TGGCCTATGGACAGATCGGTATGA, AS-AAGGGAGTAGGGGAAGGCACAGAA.

Real-time qPCR was performed in six well strips with a DNA Engine Opticon 2 unit (MJ Research). The cycle of threshold (CT) is determined as the fluorescent signal (binding of SYBR Green to double-stranded cDNA) of 1 SD over background. The efficiency of each primer pair was also measured by cloning of each PCR product into pCR-4-TOPO cloning vector (Invitrogen) and amplification with known amounts of cDNA starting material (10 pg–10 ng). The slope of the linear curve of CT vs. cDNA starting material is used to calculate the efficiency of the primer pair (efficiency = 10[–1/slope]).

Target primer pair amplifications were compared with reference primer pair amplifications (Na-K-ATPase {alpha}1-subunit) in the same experiment for each RT product tested. All reactions were carried out in duplicate, and eight separate amplifications for each primer pair were performed. The relative expression ratio of the target gene compared with the reference gene Na-K-ATPase {alpha}1-subunit was calculated according to Pfaffl (21), using the formula:

Formula

SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and Western blot analysis.
Total cellular protein for Western blot analysis was prepared from ECL cell-enriched suspensions after Nycodenz gradient separation and elutriation. The cells were resuspended in buffer containing (in mM) 10 PIPES, 2 EGTA, and 2 EDTA, pH 7.0, supplemented with one tablet of protease inhibitor cocktail tablets ("complete, EDTA-free," Roche Applied Science) and homogenized with a tight Dounce homogenizer (Wheaton, Millville, NY). The homogenate was centrifuged at 1,000 g for 5 min at 4°C. Gel samples were prepared by mixing 10 µg of total protein with 30 µl of gel sample buffer [4% SDS, 0.05% bromphenol blue (wt/vol), 20% glycerol, 1% ß-mercaptoethanol (vol/vol) in 0.1 M Tris buffer pH 6.8]. The samples (10 µg protein/lane) and unstained recombinant protein standards (Sigma) were loaded on a 4–12% SDS-polyacrylamide gel (NuPage 4–12% Bis-Tris, Invitrogen), and the gel was run in 50 mM MES buffer according to the manufacturer's instructions. After SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, proteins were transferred by electrophoresis to nitrocellulose membranes (BioPlot-NC, Costar, Cambridge, MA) for 6 h at 4°C. These membranes were washed in distilled water, and the immobilized protein was stained in 0.2% Ponceau protein stain in 3% TCA solution for 10 min. After an image was taken, membranes were washed twice with Tris-buffered saline [TBS; 10 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, 0.05% Tween (vol/vol)] and incubated in TBS containing 5% milk powder (wt/vol). After 30 min, the membranes were incubated in the primary antibody solution [polyclonal antibody against VMAT-2 (1:1,000, ABR), polyclonal antibody against HDC (1:1,000, ALPCO), and monoclonal antibody against Na-K-ATPase {alpha}1 (1:1,000, Upstate)]. After 1 h, membranes were washed twice with TBS and incubated with the secondary antibody solution [anti-mouse or anti-rabbit IgG conjugated to alkaline phosphatase (Promega, Madison, WI), diluted 1:4,000 in TBS]. After 1 h, the membranes were washed twice and incubated for 15 min in TBS. After a final wash, the membranes were incubated for 10 min in AP buffer (in mM: 100 Tris, 100 NaCl, 5 MgCl2, pH 9.5) containing 0.3% nitro blue tetrazolium solution (vol/vol) and 0.15% 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-1-phosphate solution (vol/vol) according to the manufacturer's instructions (Promega).

Confocal microscopy for ECL cell identification.
Cells from ECL cell-enriched cell suspensions isolated from fasting and fed stomachs were fixed on slides with 100% methanol for 10 min at –20°C. The slides were washed twice in TBS containing 0.2% Tween 20 (TBS-Tween) and incubated for 30 min at room temperature in TBS-Tween containing 10 mg/ml BSA (TBS-Tween-BSA) with 0.3% Triton X-100 added for permeabilization of the cell membranes. Slides were then washed twice in TBS-Tween and incubated for 1 h at room temperature with primary antibody solution [polyclonal antibody against VMAT-2 (1:100, ABR) and polyclonal antibody against HDC (1:100, ALPCO)], 100 times diluted in TBS-Tween-BSA. Then the slides were washed twice in TBS-Tween and incubated in TBS-Tween-BSA containing a 100-fold dilution of the secondary antibody against rabbit IgG Fc region conjugated with rhodamine. The slides were washed for 15 min in TBS-Tween and mounted in 70% glycerol in PBS. Slides were placed in a confocal microscope (Zeiss LSM510) with a x20 objective, an excitation of 543 nm, and an LP560 long-pass filter to detect rhodamine-specific emission. Total cells in the same field were visualized by maximal opening of the pinhole and maximal photomultiplier tube (PMT) amplification. The VMAT- and HDC-containing cells were counted.

Total histamine determination on whole gastric mucosal homogenates of 24-h fasted and ad libitum-fed rats.
Gastric mucosal homogenates were centrifuged at 10,000 rpm in an Eppendorf centrifuge. This separates membranes, nuclei, and mitochondria from the soluble fraction of the homogenate. The total protein concentration of this supernatant was used to normalize the samples used for total histamine determination with an LDN Histamine Food EIA (Labor Diagnostika Nord). Briefly, 100 µl of serial diluted supernatant was acetylated together with controls and standards provided by the kit according to the manufacturer's instructions. Acetylated histamine was quantified with a specific monoclonal antibody against acetylated histamine in an ELISA format. The final total protein concentration of each acetylated sample of supernatant from fed or fasted mucosal homogenate in the assay was 15, 1.5, or 150 pg. The ELISA is provided as microtiter assay strips, and the microplate is read after addition of substrate in a plate reader at 450 nm according to the manufacturer's instructions. A standard curve was generated with the extinction values at 450 nm and GraphPad Prism 4 software (GraphPad Software) of standards with known histamine concentrations according to the manufacturer, and sample histamine concentrations were determined.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Examination of the cell suspension isolated from fasted and fed stomachs before FACS sorting showed equal numbers of HDC-immunopositive ECL cells (~20%, Fig. 1, A and C). However, after FACS sorting, there was an ~50% reduction in the number of ECL cells from the fasting animals (7.24 ± 2.85% ECL of total cells) compared with the fed animals (15.1 ± 2.39% ECL of total cells). This decrease is due to inefficient sorting of ECL cells during FACS using the acridine orange signal in the acidic secretory vesicles. The signal is reduced and shifted to a longer wavelength because of a significant reduction in size and increased acidity of ECL cell vesicles. The latter is presumably due to a decrease in proton efflux via VMAT-2 resulting also in a decreased accumulation of histamine (Fig. 2). However, the resulting cell suspension showed >95% ECL cell purity as shown by the typical morphology of ECL cells by acridine orange uptake (Fig. 2) and by staining of the cell suspensions with an anti-HDC antibody (data not shown).


Figure 1
View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Quantification of enterochromaffin-like (ECL) cells in cell suspensions before FACS sorting. Fasting does not change the number of histamine decarboxylase (HDC)-positive cells (red, A and C, top) but significantly decreases the number of vesicular monoamine transporter 2 (VMAT-2)-positive cells (red, B and D, top) compared with all cells (gray, bottom) or with parietal cells (green, top) [confocal microscopy using x20 objective and equal settings of laser power and photomultiplier tube (PMT) in all panels; excitation 543 nm, emission <560 nm (red pseudocolor); emission <560 nm with wide open pinhole and maximal PMT amplification (gray pseudocolor); excitation 488 nm, emission 535 nm (green pseudocolor)].

 

Figure 2
View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Differences in morphology of ECL cells from fed (top) and fasted (bottom) rats. ECL cells after FACS were incubated with 100 nM acridine orange and placed under a confocal microscope. Cells obtained from fed rats show large numbers of weakly acidic vesicles (pH ~5) (yellow composite color due to equal signals of emission at 505–530 nm and <560 nm). In contrast, cells obtained from 24-h fasted rats display a significant decrease in the number and size of the vesicles and a decrease in the apparent intravesicular pH (orange to red composite color).

 
Histamine content in whole gastric mucosal homogenates.
Histamine quantification using an ELISA assay of acetylated histamine in four independent preparations of gastric fundic mucosal protein homogenates showed a significant decrease in histamine content in the homogenates of 24-h fasted (5.15 ± 0.4 ng/µg total protein; n = 4, P > 0.0001) compared with fed (8.05 ± 0.42 ng/µg total protein) animals.

ECL transcriptome under fasting conditions.
We compared ECL cell-specific transcriptomes of fasted rats to those of rats with access to food ad libitum by subtractive hybridization of labeled cRNA-derived probes to the whole rat genome microarray covering 98% of the rat genome (44K spotted oligonucleotides) (17). Gene expression values of the purified ECL cells from fed and fasted animals were compared with each other, using normalization of the data with the mean of gene expression of ß-actin and GAPDH (change in gene expression).

The data were also subtracted from the expression in gastric fundic mucosal cell suspensions from fed and fasted animals, respectively (ratio). Thus we reconfirmed significant gene expression of most of the ECL cell-specific genes, which had been identified previously (17). This experimental design enables measurement of the quantity of message for each gene independently of the total number of ECL cells isolated after FACS since the same number of purified ECL cells is used to generate equal amounts of total RNA and cRNA probes.

That the FACS-sorted cells from 24-h fasted rats are indeed highly purified ECL cells, albeit with a reduction in total number, is shown by the finding that HDC gene expression was not significantly changed (normalized intensity of 237,369 ± 23,347 in purified fasting ECL cells and 26,007 ± 6,734 in fasting gastric fundic mucosa) compared with fed rats (normalized intensity of 231,994 ± 9,857 in purified ECL cells and 26,912 ± 11,770 in gastric fundic mucosa). Furthermore, expression of one of the transcriptional regulators of the HDC promoter, gut-enriched Krüppel-like factor (Klf4) (1), was unchanged in the fasting sample as shown by the normalized intensity of 134,393 ± 18,454 in purified ECL cells from fed rats vs. 120,171 ± 33,123 after 24-h fasting. The unchanged steady-state expression of the HDC gene and one of its major transcriptional regulators in purified ECL cells after fasting compared with fed animals indicates regulation of histamine content in the ECL cells themselves by a pathway other than downregulation of HDC transcription.

Comparison of gene expression from purified ECL cells from 24-h fasted to normally fed rats showed 18 genes that were significantly induced (Table 1). Of these, seven genes appear to be uniquely expressed in the fasted ECL cell (ratio >7), while the remainder, including urocanase and histidase, appear to be expressed also in cells other than the ECL cell, anticipating a purification factor of >7 in the purified ECL cell sample. These genes are involved in reduction of L-histidine content, transcriptional regulation inducing cell quiescence, change in cell shape and inhibition of migration, induction of lipolysis, and inhibition of the mitogen-activated kinase pathway in the ECL cells from fasted animals.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Gene expression of ECL cells during fasting (upregulated genes)

 
Of the 448 previously identified ECL cell-enriched genes (17), 35 genes were significantly downregulated after 24 h of fasting (Table 2). Of these, 19 genes appear to be ECL cell specific (ECL-to-ST ratio >7), while the remainder of the genes are expressed by at least one other cell type in the gastric mucosa. These downregulated genes encode proteins involved in histamine transport into secretory vesicles, peptide hormone synthesis and secretion, neuroendocrine terminal differentiation, and inhibition of cell-cell contacts.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Gene expression of ECL cells during fasting (downregulated genes)

 
None of the listed genes is expressed significantly in purified parietal cells (see expression data published in the GEO database), suggesting ECL cell but not parietal cell gene expression. Small parietal cells are the major contaminant of this cell population because of their uptake of acridine orange in highly acidic intracellular canaliculi allowing selection during FACS sorting.

Gene expression of proteins regulating ECL cell histamine content during fasting: microarray analysis.
Histamine content in ECL cells is regulated by histamine synthesis from L-histidine and by transport from cytosolic histamine into the secretory vesicle of the cell. Since HDC gene expression in the purified ECL cells in 24-h fasted rats was unchanged, we examined the possibility that cytosolic L-histidine availability was decreased during fasting. The microarray data clearly showed significant upregulation of two rate-limiting enzymes of L-histidine degradation, histidase that converts L-histidine to urocanic acid (24) and urocanase that converts urocanic acid to 4-imidazolone-5-propionic acid (22), during fasting. Moreover, gene expression of the sodium-coupled neutral amino acid transporter SN2 (SNAT5), facilitating L-histidine uptake into the cell (19), was significantly downregulated during fasting.

Gene expression for VMAT-2, the transport protein responsible for histamine accumulation into the secretory vesicle (7), was also significantly decreased in fasting rats. This corresponds to the observed decrease in size and numbers of secretory vesicles and increased acidity of the remaining vesicular spaces in purified ECL cells from fasting animals with high-magnification confocal microscopy and acridine orange as a pH-sensitive probe (Fig. 2).

It is of interest that the urocanase gene on the rat chromosome 4 (q34) is immediately followed by a transcription factor, ZXDC, whose gene expression is repressed during fed conditions but significantly induced during fasting. This factor contains a transcriptional repressor domain (SFP1) regulating G2/M transition in addition to a DNA/RNA binding zinc finger domain, indicating control of cell cycle in addition to transcriptional activity (2). Its exact function remains to be elucidated, but it is presumably involved in regulation of gene expression in ECL cells during fasting.

Gene expression of proteins regulating ECL cell histamine content during fasting: RT-qPCR analysis of gastric fundic mucosal samples.
As identified in the microarray experiment, we confirmed downregulation of gene expression of VMAT-2, responsible for histamine uptake in secretory vesicles, and Slc38a5, responsible for L-histidine uptake into ECL cells. In addition, histidase and urocanase gene expression were significantly upregulated (Table 3 and Fig. 3). We also confirmed the significant expression of the zinc finger transcription factor ZXDC, whose gene locus is placed immediately following the urocanase gene, suggesting cotranscriptional activity in this area of the genome.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3. RT-qPCR of genes involved in ECL cell histidine metabolism

 

Figure 3
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Differences in gene expression of proteins involved in L-histidine uptake (SN2) and metabolism (histidase, urocanase), histamine synthesis (HDC), and histamine accumulation in secretory vesicles (VMAT-2). The change of gene expression due to fasting rats for 24 h is measured by microarray analysis of purified ECL cells and by reverse transcriptase (RT)-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)of whole gastric mucosal homogenate. Numbers in parentheses show the enrichment factor for each gene in purified ECL cells compared with whole gastric mucosal homogenates, indicating that some genes are expressed in cells other than ECL cells (i.e., SN2, histidase, urocanase) whereas HDC and VMAT-2 are largely ECL specific.

 
The analysis showed several quantitative differences in gene expression in the mixed cell sample from the gastric mucosal homogenates compared with purified ECL cells. This could be due to both a variation in ECL cell numbers in the samples and expression of some of the genes in cells other than ECL cells. The mRNA content for HDC was slightly but not significantly decreased in the fasting sample but showed equal expression in the purified ECL cell samples (microarray data). SN2, histidase, and urocanase showed a ratio of <7 compared with mixed gastric mucosal cells (Tables 1 and 2) in the microarray analysis. The ECL cell-specific enrichment factor should be 7–12 because of enrichment of ECL cells in the 95% pure cell suspension compared with gastric fundic mucosal cell homogenates (9–12% HDC-positive ECL cells; data not shown). The decrease in mucosal mRNA (RT-qPCR) of SN2 during fasting is significantly less compared with the ECL cell-specific mRNA samples (microarray data), indicating expression of this gene in cells other than ECL cells, in which SN2 expression is apparently unchanged or even increased. On the other hand, the significant increase in histidase and urocanase mucosal mRNA content by RT-qPCR during fasting compared with the ECL cell-specific mRNA content by microarray analysis indicates that contaminating cells in addition to ECL cells might upregulate these enzymes during fasting.

This comparison emphasizes the importance of the measurement of gene expression in the purified cell samples to enable conclusions as to the selective changes in ECL cell gene expression resulting from the different states of the cell during fasting and feeding.

Confirmation of decreased VMAT-2 protein levels compared with steady-state HDC protein levels in ECL cell-enriched suspensions before FACS of fasted vs. normally fed animals.
We observed a significant decrease in size and numbers of secretory vesicles and increased acidity of the remaining vesicular spaces in purified ECL cells from fasting animals (Fig. 2), which could be due to the decreased expression of VMAT-2 as observed in the analysis of the transcriptome. We tested the content of both HDC- and VMAT-2-positive cells in ECL cell-enriched suspensions before FACS sorting (Fig. 1). The analysis showed a significantly decreased ratio of VMAT-2-positive cells to all cells of the suspension in the fasting sample compared with the normally fed sample, with, however, equal ratios of HDC-positive cells in both samples. This result was confirmed by Western blot analysis with antibodies against VMAT-2, HDC, and Na-K-ATPase {alpha}1-subunit (normalization), showing a significant decrease of VMAT-2 protein (P < 0.001, Fig. 4) in protein homogenates of ECL cell-enriched suspensions before FACS from fasted compared with fed animals. In contrast, HDC protein expression was slightly, but not significantly, decreased. However, the well-known proteolytic processing of full-length HDC was significantly increased during 24-h fasting, resulting in a significant decrease of the intensity of the 74-kDa band. This is in good agreement with previously published results showing stabilization of constructs containing the NH2- and COOH-terminal PEST sequences, whose proteolytic processing is significantly inhibited by gastrin, leading to stabilization of these proteins (12).


Figure 4
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Western blot of VMAT-2, Na-K-ATPase {alpha}1, and HDC in total protein extracts (10 µg/lane) of ECL cell-enriched suspensions from rats normally fed (N; filled bars) or fasted for 24 h (F; open bars) containing equal numbers of HDC-positive ECL cells (see Fig. 1). VMAT-2 appears as nonglycosylated (~40 kDa), core glycosylated (~50 kDa), and complex glycosylated forms (~50–75 kDa), as shown previously (15). HDC is present as the full-length 74-kDa protein and a major processed form at ~50 kDa. Only VMAT-2 overall protein expression is significantly decreased during 24-h fasting (*P > 0.001). HDC processing is increased during 24-h fasting, but overall protein expression is slightly but not significantly decreased (P > 0.1). Na-K-ATPase {alpha}1 subunit was used for normalization (n = 6, 2 biological repeats).

 
The combined data show that ECL cells during short-term fasting regulate histamine synthesis by substrate depletion for HDC rather than downregulation of HDC gene expression. The data also show that histamine uptake into the secretory vesicles is decreased by downregulation of VMAT-2 gene expression and protein synthesis.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
The present study shows that the histamine content of the gastric mucosa is significantly reduced after 24-h fasting. To evaluate whether this loss is due to changes in gene or protein expression of the histamine-synthesizing enzyme HDC or other proteins affecting ECL cell histamine levels, we used our previously developed method of purifying ECL cells close to homogeneity in normal and fasting conditions to evaluate ECL cell-specific gene expression. Rat whole genome expression microarray analysis using subtractive hybridization (17) enables detection of ECL cell-specific changes in gene expression of most genes of the rat genome with a built-in control to assess gene expression of housekeeping genes and ECL cell-specific genes that are not changed during 24-h fasting. Our results are generally in good agreement with data published from similar work during review of this paper (13). However, the authors of that study showed a significant increase of HDC gene expression in ECL cells during the high serum gastrin concentration due to treatment of rats with the proton pump inhibitor omeprazole. It appears that the pharmacological increase of gastrin during these conditions significantly induces HDC transcription.

In contrast, the data presented here clearly show that ECL cell-specific expression of HDC and one of its major transcriptional activators, Klf4 (1), was not changed during the physiological condition of 24-h fasting. Instead, the microarray analysis identified significant changes in the expression of several other genes contributing to the significantly decreased histamine content in the cells noted with fasting. Thus genes involved in accumulation of histamine in secretory vesicles and transport of the HDC substrate L-histidine into the cell are downregulated, while those involved in degradation of L-histidine are upregulated. The net result of these effects is less total histamine synthesis in the fasting ECL cell and decreased release of the hormone. These findings were confirmed by RT-qPCR of a gastric fundic mucosal sample.

Analysis of VMAT-2 and HDC protein content on Western blots of ECL cell-enriched cell suspensions showed significantly decreased protein levels of VMAT-2 but not HDC after 24-h fasting. However, the proteolytic processing of the full-length 74-kDa form of HDC was significantly decreased in this condition. Expression studies of HDC constructs containing the NH2- or COOH-terminal PEST domains show stabilization of these proteins in the presence of gastrin and degradation in the absence of the ligand (12). Also, a recently published study identified a gastrin response element in the VMAT-2 promoter region (4). Whether HDC is tightly associated with VMAT-2 in a complex at the exocytotic vesicular membrane in gastric ECL cells resulting in HDC full-length stabilization by blocking the proteolytic PEST sequences in this enzyme remains to be elucidated.

Hence fasting for only 24 h alters ECL cell gene and protein expression to decrease its releasable histamine content, so the cell is less able to stimulate gastric acid secretion. This change in the ECL cell could be an important protective mechanism, because continual release of large quantities of histamine could lead to high gastric acid output under fasting conditions and potentially exacerbate gastric or esophageal mucosal injury (16). Figure 5 illustrates a hypothetical model showing how net histamine synthesis and transport into secretory vesicles is decreased with fasting.


Figure 5
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. Model of regulation of histamine biosynthesis and secretion in the rat gastric ECL cell during fasting. HDC activity is dependent on substrate (L-histidine) availability and low concentrations of product. During normal conditions there is significant L-histidine uptake into the cell either by the neutral amino acid transporter SN2 or through gap junctions from neighboring cells. L-Histidine degradation is low, and product is sequestered away from the HDC enzyme into secretory vesicles by the monoamine transporter VMAT-2. During fasting, L-histidine uptake is decreased and L-histidine degradation is increased, resulting in depletion of substrate for HDC, whose gene expression is not changed. Histamine transport into secretory vesicles is significantly decreased. It is these factors that are responsible for reduced histamine bioavailability during fasting.

 
The microarray analysis also suggested significant changes in transcriptional activity that increase survival and inhibit cell division, apoptosis, and terminal neuroendocrine differentiation. These changes in gene expression can be interpreted as placing the cell in a quiescent state. ECL cells downregulate gene expression of peptide hormones and proteins involved in functions that synthesize and release these peptide hormones, indicating a general decrease in the secretory capacity of the cell during fasting. ECL cells change gene expression of proteins involved in cytoskeletal organization and cell-cell contact formation. Energy metabolism by the ECL cell during fasting appears to be altered since gene expressions of components of the lipolytic cell metabolism are increased. The preliminary data obtained from the microarray analysis provide a substantial background for further studies of ECL cell physiology.

In summary, we report a detailed analysis of gene and protein expression of key proteins involved in regulating ECL cell histamine content in response to 24 h of fasting. This study provides an explanation for previously observed discrepancies in the effect of short-term gastrin on HDC gene transcription compared with HDC translation and/or activity (6, 25) as well as insight into the regulation of ECL cell histamine content during short-time gastrin reduction during fasting. It appears that during this physiological manipulation the reduced demand for ECL cell release of histamine is achieved by increased L-histidine substrate depletion resulting in decreased HDC activity, despite constant HDC gene and protein expression. In addition, there is decreased histamine accumulation in exocytotic vesicles due to decreased VMAT-2 in the cells.


    GRANTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Supported in part by the Department of Veterans Affairs and National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Grants DK-46917, DK-58333, and DK-53642.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Dr. Jeffrey Kraut for his careful review of this paper.


    FOOTNOTES
 
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: N. W. G. Lambrecht, Bldg. 113 Rm. 325A, Wadsworth VA Hospital, Los Angeles, CA 90073 (e-mail: nilslam{at}ucla.edu).

Article published online before print. See web site for date of publication (http://physiolgenomics.physiology.org).


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Ai W, Liu Y, Langlois M, Wang TC. Kruppel-like factor 4 (KLF4) represses histidine decarboxylase gene expression through an upstream Sp1 site and downstream gastrin responsive elements. J Biol Chem 279: 8684–8693, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Al-Kandari W, Jambunathan S, Navalgund V, Koneni R, Freer M, Parimi N, Mudhasani R, Fontes JD. ZXDC, a novel zinc finger protein that binds CIITA and activates MHC gene transcription. Mol Immunol 44: 311–321, 2007.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  3. Andersson K, Chen D, Mattsson H, Sundler F, Hakanson R. Physiological significance of ECL-cell histamine. Yale J Biol Med 71: 183–193, 1998.[Web of Science][Medline]
  4. Catlow K, Ashurst HL, Varro A, Dimaline R. Identification of a gastrin response element in the vesicular monoamine transporter type 2 promoter and requirement of 20S proteasome subunits for transcriptional activity. J Biol Chem 282: 17069–17077, 2007.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Chen D, Aihara T, Zhao CM, Hakanson R, Okabe S. Differentiation of the gastric mucosa. I. Role of histamine in control of function and integrity of oxyntic mucosa: understanding gastric physiology through disruption of targeted genes. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 291: G539–G544, 2006.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Chen D, Zhao CM, Yamada H, Norlen P, Hakanson R. Novel aspects of gastrin-induced activation of histidine decarboxylase in rat stomach ECL cells. Regul Pept 77: 169–175, 1998.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  7. De Giorgio R, Su D, Peter D, Edwards RH, Brecha NC, Sternini C. Vesicular monoamine transporter 2 expression in enteric neurons and enterochromaffin-like cells of the rat. Neurosci Lett 217: 77–80, 1996.[Web of Science][Medline]
  8. DiBona DR, Ito S, Berglindh T, Sachs G. Cellular site of gastric acid secretion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 76: 6689–6693, 1979.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Dimaline R, Sandvik AK. Histidine decarboxylase gene expression in rat fundus is regulated by gastrin. FEBS Lett 281: 20–22, 1991.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  10. Dimaline R, Sandvik AK, Evans D, Forster ER, Dockray GJ. Food stimulation of histidine decarboxylase messenger RNA abundance in rat gastric fundus. J Physiol 465: 449–458, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Ericsson P, Norlen P, Bernsand M, Alm P, Hoglund P, Hakanson R. ECL cell histamine mobilization studied by gastric submucosal microdialysis in awake rats: methodological considerations. Pharmacol Toxicol 93: 57–65, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  12. Fleming JV, Wang TC. Amino- and carboxy-terminal PEST domains mediate gastrin stabilization of rat L-histidine decarboxylase isoforms. Mol Cell Biol 20: 4932–4947, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Friis-Hansen L, Schjerling CK, de la Cour CD, Hakanson R, Rehfeld JF. Characteristics of gastrin controlled ECL cell specific gene expression. Regul Pept 140: 153–161, 2007.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  14. Iraki L, Bogdan A, Hakkou F, Amrani N, Abkari A, Touitou Y. Ramadan diet restrictions modify the circadian time structure in humans. A study on plasma gastrin, insulin, glucose, and calcium and on gastric pH. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 82: 1261–1273, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Jassen AK, Brown JM, Panas HN, Miller GM, Xiao D, Madras BK. Variants of the primate vesicular monoamine transporter-2. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 139: 251–257, 2005.[Medline]
  16. Kitano M, Bernsand M, Kishimoto Y, Norlen P, Hakanson R, Haenuki Y, Kudo M, Hasegawa J. Ischemia of rat stomach mobilizes ECL cell histamine. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 288: G1084–G1090, 2005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Lambrecht NW, Yakubov I, Zer C, Sachs G. The transcriptomes of purified gastric ECL and parietal cells: identification of a novel pathway regulating acid secretion. Physiol Genomics 25: 153–165, 2006.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Lindstrom E, Norlen P, Hakanson R. Histamine depletion does not affect pancreastatin secretion from isolated rat stomach ECL cells. Eur J Pharmacol 387: 19–25, 2000.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  19. Mackenzie B, Erickson JD. Sodium-coupled neutral amino acid (System N/A) transporters of the SLC38 gene family. Pflügers Arch 447: 784–795, 2004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  20. Ohning GV, Song M, Wong HC, Wu SV, Walsh JH. Immunolocalization of gastrin-dependent histidine decarboxylase activity in rat gastric mucosa during feeding. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 275: G660–G667, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Pfaffl MW. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res 29: e45, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Retey J. The urocanase story: a novel role of NAD+ as electrophile. Arch Biochem Biophys 314: 1–16, 1994.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  23. Sachs G, Prinz C, Loo D, Bamberg K, Besancon M, Shin JM. Gastric acid secretion: activation and inhibition. Yale J Biol Med 67: 81–95, 1994.[Web of Science][Medline]
  24. Taylor RG, McInnes RR. Site-directed mutagenesis of conserved serines in rat histidase. Identification of serine 254 as an essential active site residue. J Biol Chem 269: 27473–27477, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Zhao CM, Chen D, Yamada H, Dornonville de la Cour C, Lindstrom E, Persson L, Hakanson R. Rat stomach ECL cells: mode of activation of histidine decarboxylase. Regul Pept 114: 21–27, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Physiol. GenomicsHome page
B. J. Capoccia, W. J. Huh, and J. C. Mills
How form follows functional genomics: gene expression profiling gastric epithelial cells with a particular discourse on the parietal cell
Physiol Genomics, April 10, 2009; 37(2): 67 - 78.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
A. Stengel, M. Goebel, I. Yakubov, L. Wang, D. Witcher, T. Coskun, Y. Tache, G. Sachs, and N. W. G. Lambrecht
Identification and Characterization of Nesfatin-1 Immunoreactivity in Endocrine Cell Types of the Rat Gastric Oxyntic Mucosa
Endocrinology, January 1, 2009; 150(1): 232 - 238.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
31/2/183    most recent
00252.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lambrecht, N. W. G.
Right arrow Articles by Sachs, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lambrecht, N. W. G.
Right arrow Articles by Sachs, G.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the American Physiological Society.