Physiol. Genomics AJP: Heart and Circulatory Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Physiol. Genomics 5: 193-204, 2001;
1094-8341/01 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (31)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HAYES, E.
Right arrow Articles by TROUNSON, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by HAYES, E.
Right arrow Articles by TROUNSON, A.
Received 11 September 2000; accepted in final form 1 March 2001.
Physiological Genomics 5:193-204 (2001)
1094-8341/01 $5.00 © 2001 American Physiological Society

Nuclear transfer of adult and genetically modified fetal cells of the rat

ERIC HAYES , SANDRA GALEA , AMANDA VERKUYLEN , MARTIN PERA , JOHN MORRISON , ORLY LACHAM-KAPLAN and ALAN TROUNSON

Centre For Early Human Development, Monash Institute of Reproduction and Development, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3168, Australia

The present study examines the handling, activation, and micromanipulation of rat eggs in an attempt to produce live young using nuclear transfer (NT) of adult and genetically modified rat fetal cells. Mature rat eggs cultured in calcium-free medium showed reduced rates (24%) of chromosomal dispersion ("spontaneous activation" characteristic of this species) compared with eggs cultured in calcium-containing medium (47%), but failed to survive micromanipulation procedures. High rates of parthenogenetic cleavage were obtained with chemical activation using ethanol/cycloheximide (65%) compared with other standard chemical activation methods (4–28%). This type of activation was also effective in reestablishing cleavage capability (19–71%), in a time-dependent manner, of spontaneously activated eggs arrested at a second prophase-like state. At most, two of four tested micromanipulation procedures were effective in producing NT embryos capable of morula or blastocyst development (14–16%) in vivo following transfer to mouse oviducts. NT blastocysts produced from cumulus cells and transfected rat fetal fibroblasts appeared morphologically and karyotypically normal (2n = 42). Nocodazole-assisted metaphase enucleation and piezoelectric-assisted donor cell injection produced significant and equivocal effects on survival and cleavage rates of reconstructed embryos but failed to significantly improve in vivo morula/blastocyst development rates (16–28%) compared with unassisted micromanipulation (16%). Live births have not yet been obtained from early cleavage stage embryos (n = 269) transferred to pseudopregnant recipient rat oviducts. Improvements in reconstituted NT embryo culture and transfer are required for these methods to be an effective means of transgenic rat production.

activation; transfection; embryo; oocyte; transgenic




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
L. J. Mullins, I. Wilmut, and J. J. Mullins
Nuclear transfer in rodents
J. Physiol., January 1, 2004; 554(1): 4 - 12.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
A. Krivokharchenko, E. Popova, I. Zaitseva, L. Vil'ianovich, D. Ganten, and M. Bader
Development of Parthenogenetic Rat Embryos
Biol Reprod, March 1, 2003; 68(3): 829 - 836.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
X. J. Yin, T. Tani, I. Yonemura, M. Kawakami, K. Miyamoto, R. Hasegawa, Y. Kato, and Y. Tsunoda
Production of Cloned Pigs from Adult Somatic Cells by Chemically Assisted Removal of Maternal Chromosomes
Biol Reprod, August 1, 2002; 67(2): 442 - 446.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online