HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplemental Tables All Versions of this Article: 24/3/235    most recent 00210.2005v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (9) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Jiang, S.-Y. Articles by Ramachandran, S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Jiang, S.-Y. Articles by Ramachandran, S.

Comparative and evolutionary analysis of genes encoding small GTPases and their activating proteins in eukaryotic genomes

Temasek Life Sciences Laboratory, 1 Research Link, National University of Singapore, Singapore

Both small GTPase and its activating protein (GAP) superfamilies exist in various eukaryotes. The small GTPases regulate a wide variety of cellular processes by cycling between active GTP- and inactive GAP-bound conformations. The GAPs promote GTPase inactivation by stimulating the GTP hydrolysis. In this study, we identified 111 small GTPases and 85 GAPs in rice, 65 GAPs in Arabidopsis, 90 small GTPases in Drosophila melanogaster, and 35 GAPs in Saccharomyces cerevisiaeby genome-wide analysis. We then analyzed and compared a total of 498 small GTPases and 422 GAPs from these four eukaryotic and human genomes. Both animals and yeast genomes contained five families of small GTPases and their GAPs. However, plants had only four of these five families because of a lack of the Ras and RasGAP genes. Small GTPases were conserved with common motifs, but GAPs exhibited higher and much more rapid divergence. On the basis of phylogenetic analysis of all small GTPases and GAPs in five eukaryotic organisms, we estimated that their ancestors had small sizes of small GTPases and GAPs and their large-scale expansions occurred after the divergence from their ancestors. Further investigation showed that genome duplications represented the major mechanism for such expansions. Nonsynonymous substitutions per site (Ka) and synonymous substitutions per site (Ks) analyses showed that most of the divergence due to a positive selection occurred in common ancestors, suggesting a major functional divergence in an ancient era.

divergence; duplication; gene expansion; genome-wide analysis; phylogeny

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Abbal, M. Pradal, L. Muniz, F.-X. Sauvage, P. Chatelet, T. Ueda, and C. Tesniere Molecular characterization and expression analysis of the Rab GTPase family in Vitis vinifera reveal the specific expression of a VvRabA protein J. Exp. Bot., June 1, 2008; 59(9): 2403 - 2416. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Ramamoorthy, S.-Y. Jiang, N. Kumar, P. N. Venkatesh, and S. Ramachandran A Comprehensive Transcriptional Profiling of the WRKY Gene Family in Rice Under Various Abiotic and Phytohormone Treatments Plant Cell Physiol., June 1, 2008; 49(6): 865 - 879. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Abbal, M. Pradal, F.-X. Sauvage, P. Chatelet, S. Paillard, A. Canaguier, A.-F. Adam-Blondon, and C. Tesniere Molecular characterization and expression analysis of the Rop GTPase family in Vitis vinifera J. Exp. Bot., July 1, 2007; 58(10): 2641 - 2652. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]